H&R's installed. Looks fantastic, rides like buckboard.

BrettSHO

New member
Got new H&Rs installed and the stance is perfect, car leans alot less and is more sure footed, but it rides horrible. Maybe Im getting old but I can feel every crack and bump in the road shooting straight up into my spine.

The ride is drastically more harsh than stock.

Car is 2010 non PP with 80k miles.

My tires are bald so that isnt helping any. Im hoping with new tires (smoothest riding tire suggestions?) it will help some. Also, the installer didnt see any fluid leakage from the struts so I assume they are okay.. Even though its getting time for replacement.

Its not "bouncy".. Just harsh so that makes me think the shocks are probably okay ??

What say you guys?
 
I think the struts and shocks could use replacement regardless of what the installer says. Lowering springs do take a bigger toll on them anyway.

Also assuming the springs are correct for your application and are installed properly, in the correct location.  Do not know if front/rear have different spring rates.

Any blocks installed in the Springs by any chance?  MFRs use them to prevent suspension bounce while being trailered to the dealer.
 
Installed these on my 13' non pp and to me they were hardly noticeable over stock unless on bigger bumps due to less suspension travel. Heck my wife couldn't even notice the difference until I told her.
 
On an 80k mile car, I would replace shocks and struts regardless of fluid leakage, especially when going with a stiffer rate lowering spring as OEM spec shocks/struts won't have as much life with the H&Rs as they would with factory springs due to not being matched. Unfortunately there are no aftermarket shocks/struts available that I know of, so we have to live with using OEM shocks/struts with lowered springs.

On my 03 mustang, I did a full suspension overhaul at ~100k miles, and in that time (though I only had the car for 20k miles, and everything was stock) I found one bent shock, one that had no fluid and would not bounce back, and my rear diff had 3 teeth missing on the ring and pinion gear, so the car had a nasty vibration and rode like crap. I put UPR lowering springs (Eibach makes them) with Eibach shocks and struts, and though I can feel every bump, rut, etc. in the road, it corners like its on rails which is amazing for a mustang. I'm moving to coilovers in front with a tubular K member, as I am doing a turbo build on that car. In any car that I have had the pleasure of working on/riding it, going to an aftermarket lowering spring will reduce ride quality (comfort) to some extent, but the handling aspect should improve.

Make sure you get a proper alignment once the springs settle (and I would recommend doing shocks/struts before that). Furthermore, the tire situation will aggravate the issue. The less 'meat' on the tires, the more prone the car is to transmit the road to you, especially with the less cushy suspension set up. I ran the BFG Sprot Comp 2 A/S (https://www.discountedwheelwarehouse.com/Tires/details?&partno=BFG-46912&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI1Z6Pj6TS1wIVhshkCh3AKQZ1EAQYASABEgKCKfD_BwE) Not sure about that site, as I got mine from discount tire direct, but they were a pretty good tire for the price. I could feel some of the road, but generally the ride was comfy, and they hooked. I was on stock suspension though. I have heard really good things about the Continental tire offerings for the SHO, with regard to comfort, so would look there. Also, discount tire direct, and tire rack both have a rating scale on all tires offered (though it comprises of ratings for the same make of tire in all sizes) so you can get some sense of comfort vs. performance from those ratings.
 
I put on my H&R's at about 65,000 miles. 2011 - SHO w/PP. I don't feel like the ride was much worse than stock, however my coworkers 2013 non PP SHO was much softer stock to stock. I've had some form of lowering springs on all my cars so I've gotten accustomed to a firm ride over Michigan's "lovely" roads.
 
Back
Top