dubcitySHO said:Bolt patterns are slightly off. Mopars run a 5x115 which WILL for over our studs just barely, but there is no way to PROPERLY torque them down so you will be constantly fighting balancing issues aside from the inward stress on the lug studs.
I was previously looking into a set of take off wheels from a S.P. charger but decided against it for those reasons.
SHOdded said:You havent said what size wheels you are looking at, but mainly I would think stress on the axles the further out they are.
As SHOdded mentions, don't worry about the bore as long as the wheel bore is larger. My new wheels are 74.1mm bore, so I ordered a set of 63.4mm to 74.1mm hubcentric rings. The wheels mounted up and I drove on them for a wheel just centered on the studs while I was waiting for hubcentric rings to arrive. Some size combinations are not easy to find, but they are out there. I prefer metal rings vs plastic.Katnexp said:I did a little more reasearch and it looks like the hub bore is no where near the same. Looks like I’ll have to pass. $1300 for farradas with tires seemed too good to be true.
b4black said:dubcitySHO said:Bolt patterns are slightly off. Mopars run a 5x115 which WILL for over our studs just barely, but there is no way to PROPERLY torque them down so you will be constantly fighting balancing issues aside from the inward stress on the lug studs.
I was previously looking into a set of take off wheels from a S.P. charger but decided against it for those reasons.
Have you experienced this, or are you speculating?
My previous car was a '02 Buick Regal with a 115 mm bolt pattern. It was VERY common for Regal/Grand Prix owners to run Ford Mustang rims with 114.3 bolt patterns with no issues.
I suspect they are both the same bolt 4½" pattern, with just with two different names. Remember the 0.7mm gets divided in half (distance between two lugs) and is likely within the tolerances of the machined wheel.
This is one of the most debated automotive topics on the internet.