Coilovers for Flex/SHO/Explorer/MKS/MKT

How much would you pay for a set of coilovers for the transverse V6 platform?

  • $750 - $950

    Votes: 4 30.8%
  • $951 - $1050

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • $1050 - $1250

    Votes: 3 23.1%
  • $1251 - $1500

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Not interested at any price

    Votes: 4 30.8%

  • Total voters
    13
4DRHTRD said:
I couldn't wait, I have a set on the way as of today. :)

I know that feeling!! LOL I'm the same way! I knew I liked you for some reason!

I need to get my windows retinted...I dont like it without....needed to strip it for a court appearance though
 
The cars all back together, still needs an alignment. Will be done later today. I'll know more about the ride over the weekend. The plan was to hit the strip tonight but I cant get out of work :(
 
BigPelo said:
Off topic: "I love your wheels Darreli! TSW Interlagos 20x9?" /off topic

Off topic,  Yep! Thanks! I really like them too. Currently with Nitto NT05 255/45/20 but I believe I'm switching back the the factory size 245/45's and going with Michelin Pilot Super Sports. I've wore the Nittos out already
 
how did you like the nittos i was thinking of running them on my extra set of rims maybe the nt555 instead. crossing my fingers that the coilovers are amazing. might have to start making the wife mad and buy parts for the sho before sell the mazda hahahaha :thumbsup:
 
jomc111 said:
how did you like the nittos i was thinking of running them on my extra set of rims maybe the nt555 instead. crossing my fingers that the coilovers are amazing. might have to start making the wife mad and buy parts for the sho before sell the mazda hahahaha :thumbsup:

I'll know more about the coilovers after a few days of driving. The fitment was nice however.

The Nittos were ok dry traction wise. Pretty scary in rain on the freeway. Pick up pretty much everything you run over and have a TON of road noise...and are only good for about 10,000 miles..all depends on what you're looking for I guess. Look into the Invos over the NT555s in my opinion.
 
i have the invos on my second set for my mazda and i am not a fan they dont hold. i should have stated these will be for more of a track day thing i'll run the stockers with a all season most of the time
 
Sorry for further derailing this thread. But my Mickey Thompson DR's have been excellent tire, great in the rain to boot and they are quite. Darrell road in my car and he can a test to the road noise as well. And the price is right for them as well.
 
4DRHTRD said:
I drove around with 6 people a couple days back- I figured it out to be around 1400 pound of people and luggage.
Car handled it surprisingly well. :)

Awesome! Those are the kind of real world results we need!  :beer:
 
I guess I'm just imagining how ford engineers would select different dampers and springs for the flex vs the sho.  i would imagine the 2 extremes which are a fully unloaded sho rear-end vs a fully loaded flex rear-end.  in my mind that would be a potential difference of ~700 lbs. of extra people and/or bags of mulch from Lowe's.  i feel like you would want a way different amount pre-load and amount of compression travel, and in my mind an adjustable shock may help dynamically, but not static situations.

i understand that megan designed them for the potentially loaded up flex, so this would mean the springs might be too stiff for the sho.

The eibachs and H&R's are moderately shorter and stiffer than oem, but designed for the same spring load/force. i dont know how much stiffer rear springs would affect handling.

i know i may be splitting hairs here, but its mostly because i want my car to look good AND be extremely safe.  i dont want some sudden loss of control in the rear end. 

anyone have experience with a car that had too stiff of springs in the rear?

Im sure these springs will be good for drag racing, almost acting like the rear helper airbags.  but i am more concerned about affecting the safety of my daily driver.  does anyone know the spring specs for the rear of the megan kit?
 
RL-2005 said:
I guess I'm just imagining how ford engineers would select different dampers and springs for the flex vs the sho.  i would imagine the 2 extremes which are a fully unloaded sho rear-end vs a fully loaded flex rear-end.  in my mind that would be a potential difference of ~700 lbs. of extra people and/or bags of mulch from Lowe's.  i feel like you would want a way different amount pre-load and amount of compression travel, and in my mind an adjustable shock may help dynamically, but not static situations.

i understand that megan designed them for the potentially loaded up flex, so this would mean the springs might be too stiff for the sho.

The eibachs and H&R's are moderately shorter and stiffer than oem, but designed for the same spring load/force. i dont know how much stiffer rear springs would affect handling.

i know i may be splitting hairs here, but its mostly because i want my car to look good AND be extremely safe.  i dont want some sudden loss of control in the rear end. 

anyone have experience with a car that had too stiff of springs in the rear?

Im sure these springs will be good for drag racing, almost acting like the rear helper airbags.  but i am more concerned about affecting the safety of my daily driver.  does anyone know the spring specs for the rear of the megan kit?

As noted above on the spring rates. Megan said we can increase or decrease as needed. I can tell you that the rear springs arent "too firm" on the rear of the SHO. I'm still working on what will be the perfect street settings. I'm currently 5 clicks softer than the middle on the rear and 3 clicks in the front.
 
well thanks for the real-world feedback darelli

on their site i am seeing:

F: 6kg/mm
R: 14kg/mm

Larson, where did you get the 10kg front and 8kg rear? and what did you mean by "You can go up or down 2kg with Sprint springs"?

looks like they added 4DRHTRD's pics to their site, nice work.

and then they added the custom instructions for the titanium. which are different than for the SHO right?
 
the stock numbers for SHO are:

F: 177 lbs/in
R: 507 lbs/in

The Eibach for SHO are:

F: 212 lbs/in
R: 342-612 lbs/in progressive

the megan springs convert to:

F: 336 lbs/in
R: 784 lbs/in

Eibachs are approx 20% stiffer in Front and 20% stiffer in Rear than OEM
Megans are approx 89% stiffer in Front and 55% stiffer in rear than OEM
Megans are approx 58% stiffer in Front and 28% stiffer in rear than Eibach

the stock ratio from front to rear is 177/507 = .35
the Eibach ratio from front to rear is 212/612 = .35
the Megan ratio from front to rear is 336/784 = .43
 
RL-2005 said:
well thanks for the real-world feedback darelli

on their site i am seeing:

F: 6kg/mm
R: 14kg/mm

Larson, where did you get the 10kg front and 8kg rear? and what did you mean by "You can go up or down 2kg with Sprint springs"?

looks like they added 4DRHTRD's pics to their site, nice work.

and then they added the custom instructions for the titanium. which are different than for the SHO right?

Its Lanson btw,

from here http://meganracingwholesale.com/megan_racing/megan_racing_coilovers_street_series/mrcdkffx09/i-1676843.aspx

But since you're on Megan's own site, best to go with those numbers I think.

OR, maybe we should call them because that is critical. 

Also, per Megan's website you are reading off of, "All of our dampers are capable of handling a +2kg/mm or -2kg/mm change in spring rates to further tune your suspension to your desired handling characteristics."

It was "Swift" not Sprint springs btw, sorry about that. You can go up or down 2kg/mm with Swift springs if need be.
 
I'm bumping this.  I have 72K miles and have seepage out of a rear shock.  Where can I get the coilovers for the SHO?  Any modifications, or straight replacement?
 
Back
Top