LMS told me that it is capable of and at cruse it does split 65/35. I was also told it can do 100/0 and 0/100. LMS claims that by taking out the computer that controls this they can reprogram it to split 50/50. The system in the SHO is different from all the others (x-sport, flex) including the standard taurus.IHeartGroceries said:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ford GT on the rise...
- Thread starter AndyMan04
- Start date
IHeartGroceries
New member
It is mechanically incapable of a 0/100 split. It is mechanically incapable of a rear bias split.
Now, a 50/50 split with some reprogramming to control the clutch actuation, I'll buy that.
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
Now, a 50/50 split with some reprogramming to control the clutch actuation, I'll buy that.
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
crash712us
New member
Best possible torque split is 50/50 as the PTU is driven off the passenger front half shaft. As for the 150ftlb max torque spec, it's been so long ago I don't even remember where that number even came from. I would definitely like to talk to the person at LMS that told all this. Better yet I will go straight to Dan to get hear right from the horses mouth.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
wasinger3000
New member
Here is a launch. You can see the activity from the launch is fully engaged. AWD Gauge demonstrated: http://youtu.be/GSz8OaivNQI
That one shows rear bias.wasinger3000 said:Here is a launch. You can see the activity from the launch is fully engaged. AWD Gauge demonstrated: http://youtu.be/GSz8OaivNQI
wasinger3000
New member
I can make one. I'll try to tonight if I have time.SHOnUup said:As he brake boosts it sends power to the rear.
Any video without the brake boost launch?
Rich
IHeartGroceries
New member
crash712us said:Best possible torque split is 50/50 as the PTU is driven off the passenger front half shaft. As for the 150ftlb max torque spec, it's been so long ago I don't even remember where that number even came from. I would definitely like to talk to the person at LMS that told all this. Better yet I will go straight to Dan to get hear right from the horses mouth.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agreed. Except I will say a halfshaft, I believe, is generally what is used to refer to a drive axle or propeller shaft on a transverse mounted engine car. Half shafts emerge from the transaxle.
The PTU is driven by a shaft from the transaxle, with the half shafts carried from the PTU, in addition to the PTU carrying the shaft which flanges to the drive shaft. The driveshaft is continually propelled by the carriers in the PTU, but only sees load when the rear clutchpack is actuated to the RDU, and them from there to the rear wheels.
If it is arranged in this manner, it is not mechanically possible to drive a rear bias. It would need a center diff or viscous coupler.
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
vernonator said:IHeartGroceries said:What's easy for Ford seems not so easy for owners!
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
The limits that we SHO owners seem to be hitting is the transmission NOT the engine.
I was under the impression that LMS was hitting engine detonation issues around 450hp. Didn't they advise you upgrade the rods and pistons if you going past that level? Reliability is a deciding factor after all. Or perhaps Ford knows something where they can easliy get 600hp from this engine we don't know.
Sure does make for intresting talk though :thumb:
SHOnUup said:Ford's statements of 600 hp might not be at the wheels, as the 450 - 500 at the wheels would be close to the 600 statement then right?
Rich
now that you mention it, you are right. the 20% difference would make that difference.
The motorTrend head to head of the M5 vs E63 AMG is brought to mind.
They dyno'd both vechiles and claims were through the roof.
E63 advertised at 577hp at crank and made 541hp at the wheels... freaking scarey.