Gearhead and LMS E30 Tunes Dyno

BJSHO said:
creepmuzik said:
Looking forward to track results.  Gonna be running mine in about 2 weeks, this time I'll make sure I had good fuel, lol.


Well HELLO Ben! I see you have finally made your way to the forums. Welcome! Make sure to post an introduction as well!

  I know right! I've been telling him to join this group. This is where the magic happens! FB only folks don't even know much about the AMAZING AJP.
 
ClearwaterSHO said:
BJSHO said:
ClearwaterSHO said:
BJSHO said:
Unfortunately its gonna snow Sunday.. so track runs are gonna have to wait...

  That's what I am curious about the most. I went to the track last Saturday. I am anxious to compare results.

What did you run? What was the DA?

  I ran a 13.0 DA was 1796 - was 93 Octane tune though.

I remember you mentioned this before and the DA was almost identical to your 12.5 run correct or is that wrong?  13.0 doesnt sound right.  Not with your mods.  What's your take on that?
 
sm105k said:
Those aren't my dyno sheets.  Those are BJ's.  These are his dyno runs showing the difference between the LMS E30 tune and GH E30 tune with having a upgraded HPFP and GH IC.


My car didn't make any more HP or TQ with the GH IC.  It made the almost the same, but with less boost.  Brad and I seem agree that my turbos are getting tired, and the new intercooler is making them work harder because of how efficient and how much volume it flows. The IC works, I have a boost problem.

Sm105k its interesting you say that.  I'm at 18psi boost I don't think I will get much benefit with the new IC as I already have meth that gives me cooling and octane.  The IC will increase wgdc and my stockers probably will run out of breath...I need more air (ATP) upgrade.  Quite frankly we all need everything...its just what do we do next?
 
802SHO said:
sm105k said:
Those aren't my dyno sheets.  Those are BJ's.  These are his dyno runs showing the difference between the LMS E30 tune and GH E30 tune with having a upgraded HPFP and GH IC.


My car didn't make any more HP or TQ with the GH IC.  It made the almost the same, but with less boost.  Brad and I seem agree that my turbos are getting tired, and the new intercooler is making them work harder because of how efficient and how much volume it flows. The IC works, I have a boost problem.

Sm105k its interesting you say that.  I'm at 18psi boost I don't think I will get much benefit with the new IC as I already have meth that gives me cooling and octane.  The IC will increase wgdc and my stockers probably will run out of breath...I need more air (ATP) upgrade.  Quite frankly we all need everything...its just what do we do next?

Turbos are next on my list.. I have a quote in hand for Livernois to do it, and a quote in hand for my local speed shop to do it... Just waiting on a few more details...and then shore it up.  Being as LMS is so far away from me, its looking like it will be better to install locally.. I am also working with Matt at GH to finalize the quote for his turbo's installed.. At this point, it just aligning up the pieces. Payment is ready. 
 
Your car is going to rip!  Lol as if it already doesnt!  I'll have my finances in order very soon.  I am interested in GH upgraded turbos as well.  If I could do it all at once I would do the IC, HPFP, hot pipes and upgraded turbos.  That is the end goal.  For now turbos and HPFP...or turbos and IC and hot pipes.  Once I get turbos I'll quickly run out of fuel...but I can't do it all....and I don't like the idea of more boost and fuel with the stock IC plumbing....so not sure yet.  Roughly 4 grand either way.
 
802SHO said:
ClearwaterSHO said:
BJSHO said:
ClearwaterSHO said:
BJSHO said:
Unfortunately its gonna snow Sunday.. so track runs are gonna have to wait...

  That's what I am curious about the most. I went to the track last Saturday. I am anxious to compare results.
What did you run? What was the DA?

  I ran a 13.0 DA was 1796 - was 93 Octane tune though.

I remember you mentioned this before and the DA was almost identical to your 12.5 run correct or is that wrong?  13.0 doesnt sound right.  Not with your mods.  What's your take on that?

  It isn't fair to compare the two runs. 12.59 was E30 vs 13.0 on 93. The IC really starts to help out on the back half of the track. I will say that where I saw the issues was that my 60ft were back to what they were stock. I was seeing 1.9-2.1 60ft times. Like the car just wasn't building boost off the line. Logs show it is though, so I don't know. That is a question for Matt or Brad on what was going on. I have a GH tune, I'm going to see what happens with that. Matt mentioned something about the WGDC settings need to be adjusted for the new volume of the intercooler.
 
Ok.  I asked because I would like to think even a potent 93 tune would net you under a 13.  Based on the time alone it sounded like something wasnt quite right.  Hopefully you get it sorted out.  Your E30 tune for sure will beat the 93 tune but 93 should have done better. 
 
802SHO said:
Ok.  I asked because I would like to think even a potent 93 tune would net you under a 13.  Based on the time alone it sounded like something wasnt quite right.  Hopefully you get it sorted out.  Your E30 tune for sure will beat the 93 tune but 93 should have done better.

  Yea, I thought so too. I was honestly expecting to be close to what my E30 tune ran before the IC with the 93, but I guess I was over ambitious about it. Won't be able to run the 1/4 again until March 16th. I'll be able to go to the 1/8th mile next Wednesday, but it's going to be cool out and I'm not sure the stock HPFP can keep up with the E30 tune in 40-50 degree weather.
 
802SHO said:
sm105k said:
Those aren't my dyno sheets.  Those are BJ's.  These are his dyno runs showing the difference between the LMS E30 tune and GH E30 tune with having a upgraded HPFP and GH IC.


My car didn't make any more HP or TQ with the GH IC.  It made the almost the same, but with less boost.  Brad and I seem agree that my turbos are getting tired, and the new intercooler is making them work harder because of how efficient and how much volume it flows. The IC works, I have a boost problem.

Sm105k its interesting you say that.  I'm at 18psi boost I don't think I will get much benefit with the new IC as I already have meth that gives me cooling and octane.  The IC will increase wgdc and my stockers probably will run out of breath...I need more air (ATP) upgrade.  Quite frankly we all need everything...its just what do we do next?

I am in a the similar boat.  I am almost out of fuel and my turbos are tired. I have the IAT's and spark, I just don't have the air and fuel anymore.

The stock intercooler bottlenecks the stock turbos which allowed them to stay at a higher boost level.  This new IC is a bit bigger and it has dropped the boost level across the board, because of the increased area and volume. 

I could have my stockers rebuilt with a pair of upgraded wheels, or I can get brand new stock turbos off Tasca for like $427 a turbo.  However, with new stock turbos, I will be out of fuel completely.  So either way, I am spending $3400 minimum (upgraded HPFP, rebuilt with billet wheels or stock turbos, and catless DP's) to achieve the power levels I am seeking. 
 
ClearwaterSHO said:
802SHO said:
Ok.  I asked because I would like to think even a potent 93 tune would net you under a 13.  Based on the time alone it sounded like something wasnt quite right.  Hopefully you get it sorted out.  Your E30 tune for sure will beat the 93 tune but 93 should have done better.

  Yea, I thought so too. I was honestly expecting to be close to what my E30 tune ran before the IC with the 93, but I guess I was over ambitious about it. Won't be able to run the 1/4 again until March 16th. I'll be able to go to the 1/8th mile next Wednesday, but it's going to be cool out and I'm not sure the stock HPFP can keep up with the E30 tune in 40-50 degree weather.

You should be stable with the fuel pressure in 40-50 degree weather.  I was with a little more wiggle room.
 
sm105k said:
ClearwaterSHO said:
802SHO said:
Ok.  I asked because I would like to think even a potent 93 tune would net you under a 13.  Based on the time alone it sounded like something wasnt quite right.  Hopefully you get it sorted out.  Your E30 tune for sure will beat the 93 tune but 93 should have done better.

  Yea, I thought so too. I was honestly expecting to be close to what my E30 tune ran before the IC with the 93, but I guess I was over ambitious about it. Won't be able to run the 1/4 again until March 16th. I'll be able to go to the 1/8th mile next Wednesday, but it's going to be cool out and I'm not sure the stock HPFP can keep up with the E30 tune in 40-50 degree weather.

You should be stable with the fuel pressure in 40-50 degree weather.  I was with a little more wiggle room.

Depends on the tune and the car...
 
BJSHO said:
creepmuzik said:
Looking forward to track results.  Gonna be running mine in about 2 weeks, this time I'll make sure I had good fuel, lol.


Well HELLO Ben! I see you have finally made your way to the forums. Welcome! Make sure to post an introduction as well!

Hey guys, lol.  I've actually been a member for about 2 years.  Just pop in for research mostly.  Where do I do an intro post at?
 
creepmuzik said:
BJSHO said:
creepmuzik said:
Looking forward to track results.  Gonna be running mine in about 2 weeks, this time I'll make sure I had good fuel, lol.


Well HELLO Ben! I see you have finally made your way to the forums. Welcome! Make sure to post an introduction as well!

Hey guys, lol.  I've actually been a member for about 2 years.  Just pop in for research mostly.  Where do I do an intro post at?

New Member Introductions on the forum page at the top.
 
BJSHO said:
sm105k said:
ClearwaterSHO said:
802SHO said:
Ok.  I asked because I would like to think even a potent 93 tune would net you under a 13.  Based on the time alone it sounded like something wasnt quite right.  Hopefully you get it sorted out.  Your E30 tune for sure will beat the 93 tune but 93 should have done better.

  Yea, I thought so too. I was honestly expecting to be close to what my E30 tune ran before the IC with the 93, but I guess I was over ambitious about it. Won't be able to run the 1/4 again until March 16th. I'll be able to go to the 1/8th mile next Wednesday, but it's going to be cool out and I'm not sure the stock HPFP can keep up with the E30 tune in 40-50 degree weather.

You should be stable with the fuel pressure in 40-50 degree weather.  I was with a little more wiggle room.

Depends on the tune and the car...

  Well, I did some logging last night and I was at 2k on the Fuel Pressure. I'm not great at reading logs, so I'm not sure what other fuel pressure numbers you need to look at.
 
creepmuzik said:
BJSHO said:
creepmuzik said:
Looking forward to track results.  Gonna be running mine in about 2 weeks, this time I'll make sure I had good fuel, lol.


Well HELLO Ben! I see you have finally made your way to the forums. Welcome! Make sure to post an introduction as well!

Hey guys, lol.  I've actually been a member for about 2 years.  Just pop in for research mostly.  Where do I do an intro post at?
Welcome Creepmuzik! INTRO is on the below link.  Z  :)

https://www.ecoboostperformanceforum.com/index.php/board,14.0.html
 
sm105k said:
My car didn't make any more HP or TQ with the GH IC.  It made the almost the same, but with less boost.  Brad and I seem agree that my turbos are getting tired, and the new intercooler is making them work harder because of how efficient and how much volume it flows. The IC works, I have a boost problem.

I'm assuming the ATP turbo upgrade would do it, but...would upgrading the impellers be enough?
 
4sfed said:
sm105k said:
My car didn't make any more HP or TQ with the GH IC.  It made the almost the same, but with less boost.  Brad and I seem agree that my turbos are getting tired, and the new intercooler is making them work harder because of how efficient and how much volume it flows. The IC works, I have a boost problem.

I'm assuming the ATP turbo upgrade would do it, but...would upgrading the impellers be enough?

So, ATPs are nice, but the wastegate it comes with is not correct for our application from what I understand. I know one guy who had to make some major adjustments to get it right, and he still isn’t happy with it. The only people who don’t have those issues are the LMS installed ATPs. They order them with a different wastegate setup, however, they won’t tell me which wastegate they order them with.


EDIT: They don't order them from ATP with any different setup, as I just spoke with ATP 2 minutes ago. They only offer them one way. So whatever adjustments are made, happens after they ship by Livernois.
 
And let me guess the only way to get them is an in house install?  What about GH turbos?  Are they ready for sale yet?
 
Back
Top