H&R lowering springs

Status
Not open for further replies.
Upgraded to BC coilovers only about 10k on the springs in great condition
$175

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

d2aab6007d234ad882f6b9d1bed7bfef.jpg
a1741c3b74fe21715e260349a6990c7f.jpg
 
Hmm I wonder what's different because I just installed BC coilovers that were off a SHO

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 
I can't imagine the weight being much different. Maybe a few hundred lbs? But it could be a factor in towing maybe. I don't think the SHO is even rated to tow, where a flex can tow like 2k or something.
 
GhostlyGrenade said:
I can't imagine the weight being much different. Maybe a few hundred lbs? But it could be a factor in towing maybe. I don't think the SHO is even rated to tow, where a flex can tow like 2k or something.
4.5k to be exact ;)
But yes, the rating is based on the Flex being heavy in the rear compared to the SHO. Makes more of a difference with springs, there have been some issues where people using the SHO springs on a Flex had the rear sagging.
 
StinkinLinkin13 said:
I don't believe so. My part number was H&R 51675 on my 16 MKS.

I've heard people using stock SHO springs on explorers, Explore's and Flex's springs are compatible as well.
 
It could be the Height difference! Z


FLEX-Note: Avg low 1.2"F & 1.9"R.

SH0- Note: Avg low 1.4"F & 1.5"R.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top