Here is a video of my race with a 2012-2013 Mustang 5.0

[ZSHO]

I would honestly Email Anthony or Brandon over at LMS and ask them if the 4xxx is suitable for a DD,i have the V8 and havent had any issues,regarding the stat there is no direction,just slap it in with the old o ring,good luck.

 

[SHOnUup]

Oh yeah? I'm running the 4++++. It's super aggressive. Pretty much hit warp speed the other day.

4+++++....lol....lms updated tunes for my 2011 this year does have a 4++...3 bar on order...3 bar still means tune only right? If so, I'm coming for that 12.669 fastest tune only?

 

[Brucelinc]

The new LMS 4X is a great daily driver tune as long as you can get 93 octane fuel.  Based on my Aeroforce gauge, there is no knock that results in retarded timing and the fuel pressure and  cylinder head temps are in line with the 4+.  I think the idle and overall behavior is smoother plus I am getting a bit better overall fuel mileage than with 4+.

You will see higher sustained boost than with 4+ but there are no wild crazy boost spikes.  The boost comes on earlier and stays steady right to the shift point.  It seems that they did a nice job of balancing boost, timing and fuel with this tune.  Oh, by the way, my 0-60 dropped from 4.20 to 3.94 based on the Aeroforce gauge. 

 

[wasinger3000]

What all do you have done to your car?

 

[ShoBoat]

Oh yeah? I'm running the 4++++. It's super aggressive. Pretty much hit warp speed the other day.

Lol Warp 9?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[wasinger3000]

Oh yeah? I'm running the 4++++. It's super aggressive. Pretty much hit warp speed the other day.

Lol Warp 9?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nah I only made it to 8.9999999999. So close though. Maybe if I twist my #8 spark plug so it faces north I can get to warp 9.

Haha.

 

[Brucelinc]

What all do you have done to your car?

Just the tune and a K&N filter in an airbox with a 3 inch hole cut in it and PVC plumbed to an opening in the inner fender area.  I also have a bit lighter tire/wheel combination than stock.  The road where I test is new concrete that is very abrasive and provides awesome traction from a dig.   

 

[wasinger3000]

What all do you have done to your car?

Just the tune and a K&N filter in an airbox with a 3 inch hole cut in it and PVC plumbed to an opening in the inner fender area.  I also have a bit lighter tire/wheel combination than stock.  The road where I test is new concrete that is very abrasive and provides awesome traction from a dig. 

Guess I need to see what my 0-60 is. I need to find a better way to measure. Torque is to slow. Maybe I'll use livelink.

 

[SHOnUup]

Oh yeah? I'm running the 4++++. It's super aggressive. Pretty much hit warp speed the other day.

Lol Warp 9?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nah I only made it to 8.9999999999. So close though. Maybe if I twist my #8 spark plug so it faces north I can get to warp 9.

Haha.

Too Funny

 

[Brucelinc]

Everyone I know who uses Torque reports slower times than they should be.  I am not sure what the deal is but I have seen it many times.  Maybe the Aeroforce gauge is optimistic but a friend of mine with one has compared it with 2 other measuring tools and found it to be quite accurate. 

When totally stock, I was around 5.2 - 5.3 which is very much in line with the magazine road tests.

 

[wasinger3000]

Everyone I know who uses Torque reports slower times than they should be.  I am not sure what the deal is but I have seen it many times.  Maybe the Aeroforce gauge is optimistic but a friend of mine with one has compared it with 2 other measuring tools and found it to be quite accurate. 

When totally stock, I was around 5.2 - 5.3 which is very much in line with the magazine road tests.

What's weird is with what I have done and running a e30 tune torque shows a 5.8 or around there. I know I'm not that slow lol. With live link before my e30 tune I saw a flat 5. Which still seems slow.. idk... I need a solid measuring device. 

 

[ShoBoat]

Everyone I know who uses Torque reports slower times than they should be.  I am not sure what the deal is but I have seen it many times.  Maybe the Aeroforce gauge is optimistic but a friend of mine with one has compared it with 2 other measuring tools and found it to be quite accurate. 

When totally stock, I was around 5.2 - 5.3 which is very much in line with the magazine road tests.

What's weird is with what I have done and running a e30 tune torque shows a 5.8 or around there. I know I'm not that slow lol. With live link before my e30 tune I saw a flat 5. Which still seems slow.. idk... I need a solid measuring device.

dynolicious


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[SHOnUup]

Everyone I know who uses Torque reports slower times than they should be.  I am not sure what the deal is but I have seen it many times.  Maybe the Aeroforce gauge is optimistic but a friend of mine with one has compared it with 2 other measuring tools and found it to be quite accurate. 

When totally stock, I was around 5.2 - 5.3 which is very much in line with the magazine road tests.

What's weird is with what I have done and running a e30 tune torque shows a 5.8 or around there. I know I'm not that slow lol. With live link before my e30 tune I saw a flat 5. Which still seems slow.. idk... I need a solid measuring device.

Just used torque 60 time out testing the brakes and got a 5.4 and a 5.6...way slow

 

[wasinger3000]

Everyone I know who uses Torque reports slower times than they should be.  I am not sure what the deal is but I have seen it many times.  Maybe the Aeroforce gauge is optimistic but a friend of mine with one has compared it with 2 other measuring tools and found it to be quite accurate. 

When totally stock, I was around 5.2 - 5.3 which is very much in line with the magazine road tests.

What's weird is with what I have done and running a e30 tune torque shows a 5.8 or around there. I know I'm not that slow lol. With live link before my e30 tune I saw a flat 5. Which still seems slow.. idk... I need a solid measuring device.

Just used torque 60 time out testing the brakes and got a 5.4 and a 5.6...way slow

Ok good. Hah. I thought I was the only one.

 

[Brucelinc]

Everyone I know who uses Torque reports slower times than they should be.  I am not sure what the deal is but I have seen it many times.  Maybe the Aeroforce gauge is optimistic but a friend of mine with one has compared it with 2 other measuring tools and found it to be quite accurate. 

When totally stock, I was around 5.2 - 5.3 which is very much in line with the magazine road tests.

What's weird is with what I have done and running a e30 tune torque shows a 5.8 or around there. I know I'm not that slow lol. With live link before my e30 tune I saw a flat 5. Which still seems slow.. idk... I need a solid measuring device.

Just used torque 60 time out testing the brakes and got a 5.4 and a 5.6...way slow

Yes, with your quarter mile ET, your 0-60 should be around 4 flat or better.  There is a calculator on one of the threads that shows what 0-60 would be based on the quarter mile ET and maybe some other criteria.

 

[SHOnUup]

I notice my torque MPH gauge is a couple MPH behind car gauge too?

 

[SHOnUup]

Funny thing is I coasted the last couple hundred feet of 1/4 mile and still hit a 13.7

 

[Brucelinc]

You mean 12.7, right....as in your signature?

 

[SHOnUup]

Not coasting to 12.7 for sure...but a 5.8 60 mph time to a coasted 13.7 sounds off...the 12.75 was at Milan Dragway

 

[ecoboostsho]

I notice my torque MPH gauge is a couple MPH behind car gauge too?

Depending on how many PIDs you are monitoring Torque can get laggy...but there are a few factors at play.  The first is the hardware you are running it on...then there is Bluetooth connection quality, number of PIDs/calculations, alarms, and finally any logging you are actually doing to the SD card.  I minimize my gauges to exactly what is needed but still don't trust Torque for 0-60 times.