Good question. Doing the simple math of number of cylinders and size (2.3/4 and 3.5/6) I think there was a .005 difference per cylinder. Is it just 2 cylinders smaller?SHOdded said:Anybody seen any torture test videos on these smaller motors like they did with the 3.5? Or has the assumption been that the technology is proven once and is not affected by size?
SHOnUup said:Just got confirmation from Livernois, tune only...20 " rims...factory everything else!
Yup. Luckily the Stang is not "limited" by AWD where power is concerned. Some specs for the engine:jtoddk98 said:Amazing that a little 4 cup can put 327hp and 427tq to the wheels with just a tune. Isn't that what our cars lay down with just a tune?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They will at some point be limited by traction lol. I wonder how long that turbo will last running such high boost levels. From what I see, our cars can reliably put 500hp down to the wheels reliably. That little 2.3 is still amazing though, but if we're putting in an order for a stang, it'd be a 5.0SHOdded said:Yup. Luckily the Stang is not "limited" by AWD where power is concerned. Some specs for the engine:jtoddk98 said:Amazing that a little 4 cup can put 327hp and 427tq to the wheels with just a tune. Isn't that what our cars lay down with just a tune?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
http://www.latemodelrestoration.com/products/2015-Mustang-Engine-Specs-23L-EcoBoost-4-Cylinder
jtoddk98 said:Amazing that a little 4 cup can put 327hp and 427tq to the wheels with just a tune. Isn't that what our cars lay down with just a tune?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk