MKspool said:What should a '14 MKS with a 93p and a 3bar run?
I feel using logs is most accurate... with the calculator I got 3.8 0-60 with logs 4.4 using a log from my 12.4 run and my 12.4 timeslips to calc the 3.8MKspool said:OK, just checking. After a few datalogs with the x4 they all consistently calculated to around 4.7 to 5.1 which doesn't seem accurate to me.
How accurate is the x4 when you use speed + mph to calculate 0 to 60?
The tune feels aggressive but the shifts are never harsh. At WOT they're even smoother. Now I did have some knock at first but I blame it on winter gas and a combination of my oil shearing down. I've used mobil one for over 10 years with no issues, but I've moved to royal purple plus they make it right down the road. I'll say mobil can't handle the turbos past 5k.
PTU oil looks great after multiple launches with royal. It was still purple at 5k.
Plugs are at. 28. Pipes, Meth, and many upgrades are on the way. I'm willing to sell my boat to make this the worlds fastest mks lol.
I'll be posting my progress!
TSS said:I agree with the 3.9XX being attainable in ideal conditions. I can hit that with my 2010 MKS . 3.94 to be exact. I don't do anything special or any weight reduction beyond not testing right after I fill the car up. LOL
Are you getting any wheel slippage? I would hit 5.2 stock - perhaps you are getting wheel spin? How fresh is the rubber?
I just a 3 bar 4X PLUS (with soft shift 1-2) 93 octane tune.....
TopherSho said:TSS said:I agree with the 3.9XX being attainable in ideal conditions. I can hit that with my 2010 MKS . 3.94 to be exact. I don't do anything special or any weight reduction beyond not testing right after I fill the car up. LOL
Are you getting any wheel slippage? I would hit 5.2 stock - perhaps you are getting wheel spin? How fresh is the rubber?
I just a 3 bar 4X PLUS (with soft shift 1-2) 93 octane tune.....
3.9x is crazy fast for only a 3bar!
TopherSho said:TSS said:I agree with the 3.9XX being attainable in ideal conditions. I can hit that with my 2010 MKS . 3.94 to be exact. I don't do anything special or any weight reduction beyond not testing right after I fill the car up. LOL
Are you getting any wheel slippage? I would hit 5.2 stock - perhaps you are getting wheel spin? How fresh is the rubber?
I just a 3 bar 4X PLUS (with soft shift 1-2) 93 octane tune.....
3.9x is crazy fast for only a 3bar!
Boost leak possibly? That's what it sounds like to me.AJP turbo said:Couple weird things I see in the log....You are commanding almost 15 psi but yet you are barely getting that even on your boost spikes...and your boost is tapering very badly down to less than 10 psi I even saw about 9.2 psi at redline. That's even more weird because your wastegate duty cycle is pegged at 100% in places....You should have no problem exceeding 20 psi with that kind of duty cycle.
I don't think there is anything wrong but I suspect it's because how the wastegate settings are in your tune but there is no way for me to verify that.
I also think you 0-60 times are hurting because you never really reach very high boost and it tapers....When spooling up you normally see the ECU overshoot the boost targets which isn't bad because it's gets these big pigs moving but when your boost tapers to 9 psi in 1st and 2nd gear it's not surprising to me that you are satisfied with yoru 0-60
AJP turbo said:Couple weird things I see in the log....You are commanding almost 15 psi but yet you are barely getting that even on your boost spikes...and your boost is tapering very badly down to less than 10 psi I even saw about 9.2 psi at redline. That's even more weird because your wastegate duty cycle is pegged at 100% in places....You should have no problem exceeding 20 psi with that kind of duty cycle.
I don't think there is anything wrong but I suspect it's because how the wastegate settings are in your tune but there is no way for me to verify that.
I also think you 0-60 times are hurting because you never really reach very high boost and it tapers....When spooling up you normally see the ECU overshoot the boost targets which isn't bad because it's gets these big pigs moving but when your boost tapers to 9 psi in 1st and 2nd gear it's not surprising to me that you are satisfied with yoru 0-60
What is the elevation where you live?
1700 is a little warm for my taste and cat protection mode should step in if it has not been disabled.MKspool said:AJP turbo said:Couple weird things I see in the log....You are commanding almost 15 psi but yet you are barely getting that even on your boost spikes...and your boost is tapering very badly down to less than 10 psi I even saw about 9.2 psi at redline. That's even more weird because your wastegate duty cycle is pegged at 100% in places....You should have no problem exceeding 20 psi with that kind of duty cycle.
I don't think there is anything wrong but I suspect it's because how the wastegate settings are in your tune but there is no way for me to verify that.
I also think you 0-60 times are hurting because you never really reach very high boost and it tapers....When spooling up you normally see the ECU overshoot the boost targets which isn't bad because it's gets these big pigs moving but when your boost tapers to 9 psi in 1st and 2nd gear it's not surprising to me that you are satisfied with yoru 0-60
What is the elevation where you live?
My elevation is 8,749 feet in Houston. And I may have a boost leak or a failing turbo, I followed one of the hot pipes and I have very little burnt oil on the passenger side turbo.
I've ran 93 from shell, chevron and Exxon all with the same results.
Should I try some new hot pipes? Also my cats are reaching 1700F, which to me sounds like they are melting. Might need catless dp's as well?
Or is it just too much knock pulling timing? My sensor is isolated and wrapped in a rubber hose. I replaced the plugs 8k miles ago, maybe I need to go to a colder plug to deal with the houston humidity and heat.
Brucelinc said:8700 feet in Houston, TX? Don't you mean between 87 and 100 feet?
I thought that seemed awful high... lolMKspool said:Brucelinc said:8700 feet in Houston, TX? Don't you mean between 87 and 100 feet?
Yes, you're right I googled Texas elevation instead of sea level. Brain fart![]()