2016 SHO / MKS mule

I actually saw this mule a couple weeks ago around Dearborn.. Took a couple pics but they're on my other phone. I'll upload them when I get a chance

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

 
Just show me the weight reduction of 500-700 lbs. and I will come back for another round of SHO. Each 100 lbs. weight savings is roughly equitable to a solid tenth in the quarter mile. 13.1 to 13.3 quarter mile stock would be a nice starting point.
 
SRT82ECOBOOST said:
Just show me the weight reduction of 500-700 lbs. and I will come back for another round of SHO. Each 100 lbs. weight savings is roughly equitable to a solid tenth in the quarter mile. 13.1 to 13.3 quarter mile stock would be a nice starting point.

that too and a decent powered 3.5L TT engine that cranks right at 400hp.... GM's 3.6L TT engine makes 420...  :squint:
Time for ford to rise the bar a bit.
 
http://www.carscoops.com/2013/04/scoop-lincoln-filmed-trying-out-2016.html?m=1

A video to go with the pic above, I'm not crazy about how the stance is on the road.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Does displacement matter if the power is there? I see people getting all bitchy about the rumored demise of the 3.5L, but if the power is good, who cares?
 
We won't know until someone gets their hands on the 2.7 and pushes it to its tuning limits. Since it is made of strong materials it might be able to make a good number. Or it will have all kinds of limitations, like fuel,  turbo, and all the other little things.
 
Back
Top