Hesitation in boost and high rpm

Exactly... the Ford dealership I eventually went too understood completely what I meant when I asked for a strategy update...

The service advisor wanted me to come back once I got the tune put back on so he could ride in it lol...

They also sourced me a new HPFP when I was trouble shooting a fueling issue AND price matched it from an online dealerships site...
 
FoMoCoSHO said:
Polski, you sneak!

X3 received....perfect timing for the new acquisition to arrive!

Thanks!
I planned to throw a usb cable in there but it didn't physicaly make it inside the box lol. Can't thank you enough for aiding in that discovery, I hope you don't miss that one vin allowance!
 
I would like to thank everyone with their 18 pages (so far) of support. Take a minute to get to know my car tinkering roots a little better as I see many of you as friends.

Had a little business with my brother Dave designing and fabricating a replacement part for one that Trd/Vortec failed on.

Site
 
polskifacet said:
StealBlueSho said:
Looks like a completely normal stock log to me.... geeze...
Can you post a log of your latest LMS tune? It's crazy that our cars are so similar all the way down to the transmission.

This is the latest one I have from a LMS standpoint.. 4+X... the only difference with the newer tune is a softer shift... which honestly... isn't exactly soft, just not bone crunching and feeling the the tranny is going bang itself into oblivion...
 
StealBlueSho said:
polskifacet said:
StealBlueSho said:
Looks like a completely normal stock log to me.... geeze...
Can you post a log of your latest LMS tune? It's crazy that our cars are so similar all the way down to the transmission.

This is the latest one I have from a LMS standpoint.. 4+X... the only difference with the newer tune is a softer shift... which honestly... isn't exactly soft, just not bone crunching and feeling the the tranny is going bang itself into oblivion...

Bah perfect fuel pressure
 
polskifacet said:
StealBlueSho said:
polskifacet said:
StealBlueSho said:
Looks like a completely normal stock log to me.... geeze...
Can you post a log of your latest LMS tune? It's crazy that our cars are so similar all the way down to the transmission.

This is the latest one I have from a LMS standpoint.. 4+X... the only difference with the newer tune is a softer shift... which honestly... isn't exactly soft, just not bone crunching and feeling the the tranny is going bang itself into oblivion...

Bah perfect fuel pressure


Sorry bud :-/ Any word from LMS?
 
With everyone thinking engine, the transmission is the wild card here.  Or may be a flaw in the PCM strategy.  Any way to get LME to get an engineer from Ford to look at it?
 
SHOdded said:
With everyone thinking engine, the transmission is the wild card here.  Or may be a flaw in the PCM strategy.  Any way to get LME to get an engineer from Ford to look at it?
From what I understand, LMS can completely flash the PCM, even to another strategy. LMS mentioned transmission but then my answer to that was I'm about 30k miles deep with this issue and imagine the heat that would buildup if the trans was creating any sort of drag on the system. My trans temps are good and the fluid looks like I just poured it in.
 
SHOdded said:
With everyone thinking engine, the transmission is the wild card here.  Or may be a flaw in the PCM strategy.  Any way to get LME to get an engineer from Ford to look at it?


Would the transmission be causing the fueling issues?
 
Don't know.  The back and forth between engine & transmission is too complicated for me, LOL.  But since a MAF or MAP sensor affects shift strategy, you would think feedback from the trans would affect engine fueling decisions.  Not unlike a "granny", or the PCM's way of dealing with something unusual that it can't put its' finger on.
 
    Alright....

    So, lets recant everything, the vehicle had a hesitation at high RPM during cold weather scenarios on the v8 and v10 tunes.
A different tune was written by a different tune that tuned around the issue. After figuring out how to get hands on with the vehicle, we ran the vehicle on the
dyno. Adam Got here on thursday in the morning, it was raining and 40 degrees out. The vehicle was run 8-10 times during the tenure of it's visit. We attempted to replicate the conditions to no avail. Even dead cold with a fan blowing and the door open we were unable to replicate the hesitation on the vehicle with the 93 tune. All signs point to a fuel issue yet it was not able to be replicated while on a dyno, nor did it show in the logs that were taken on the dyno. We are at a loss here as we have over a thousand vehicles running the exact same tune with no similar issues. The only way we could potentially diagnose said issue is to have the vehicle for an extended period of time for full evaluation with no guarantee of finding the source of the issue.
    Recently we have had 2 2013MY Ford Ecoboost vehicles (one Explorer, one SHO) that both experienced hesitations that ended up being a bad injector in both cases. Adam has a 2013MY vehicle. The problem being that we could not replicate the issue in the time that the vehicle was here. Adam's vehicle also put down sufficient if not above sufficient numbers for a 93 tune on an SHO. We maintain that in our professional opinion that the issue is with the vehicle itself and not the tune.
 
Livernois Motorsports said:
    Alright....

    So, lets recant everything, the vehicle had a hesitation at high RPM during cold weather scenarios on the v8 and v10 tunes.
A different tune was written by a different tune that tuned around the issue. After figuring out how to get hands on with the vehicle, we ran the vehicle on the
dyno. Adam Got here on thursday in the morning, it was raining and 40 degrees out. The vehicle was run 8-10 times during the tenure of it's visit. We attempted to replicate the conditions to no avail. Even dead cold with a fan blowing and the door open we were unable to replicate the hesitation on the vehicle with the 93 tune. All signs point to a fuel issue yet it was not able to be replicated while on a dyno, nor did it show in the logs that were taken on the dyno. We are at a loss here as we have over a thousand vehicles running the exact same tune with no similar issues. The only way we could potentially diagnose said issue is to have the vehicle for an extended period of time for full evaluation with no guarantee of finding the source of the issue.
    Recently we have had 2 2013MY Ford Ecoboost vehicles (one Explorer, one SHO) that both experienced hesitations that ended up being a bad injector in both cases. Adam has a 2013MY vehicle. The problem being that we could not replicate the issue in the time that the vehicle was here. Adam's vehicle also put down sufficient if not above sufficient numbers for a 93 tune on an SHO. We maintain that in our professional opinion that the issue is with the vehicle itself and not the tune.

I accept the above but Andy said the plan was to check each cylinder with a camera and force the in-tank fuel pump "on" which would show if there was indeed any leaky injectors.
 
Yes, and I agree.  But do you have diagnostic aids to do a deep dive, like Ford IDS does, without tearing things apart?  As users we have access to a few pids, but obviously as a tuner you have a plethora of options to choose from.  I don't know if even a cylinder power balance test or ignition waveform analysis would be all that's needed.  Some ripples that are inconsequential at lower throttle input but significant at WOT.  Could it be an emissions issue?  Possibly crud being sucked in volume from the intercooler?
 
So LMS failed in not checking the injectors but I can get past that. New direction of topic, how shall I test said injectors? I have great fuel mileage. The only thing that kind of popped in my head was my dad complained that my exhaust smelled like fuel after flooring it from a dig when he was driving behind me. I assume this is normal in a tuned turbo car and keeping a .73 afr at WOT.
 
Hmmmm... curious... and maybe LMS can correct me if I am wrong... BUT if you had a leaky injector wouldn't your wide band O2's be reading stupid rich?

And there is a company that can test them, let me find the link, but you would need to remove them from the car and mail them to them... I think they are based in Canada IIRC...
 
You would have to get Ford or Ford-level equipment to test the injectors directly, very expensive on your own.  An indirect way is the balance test, and ignition waveform.  Basically, we want to prove that the problem exists in the engine and not outside or vice versa.  If the balance test fails at high rpm, then you can look at the graphs to identify the miscreant cylinder(s).

A sticking injector might be an issue, given that flooring from a dig outputs a fuel smell.  How intense was it?  WOT IS going to run richer, so a mild smell would be expected because you cannot make that smooth transition at the drop of a dime.  There's always a small window of inefficiency.  So how bad the smell is will tell you whether that is indeed an issue to be researched.

Now, looking back, you have a new engine in there right?  Long block new injectors new everything except manifolds?
 
Back
Top