New Best for the Big Girl

FoMoCoSHO said:
Tonight's results

12.73@109.33 (Unhappy Coyote Mustang)
Click to expand...

LOL! If there is more to this story, I'd like to hear it.

Great times. It's awesome that such a behemoth of a car can so upsettingly embarrass much smaller and lighter sports cars.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
FoMoCoSHO said:
Tonight's results

Out of the gate...
12.66@109.14
12.70@109.65
12.67@109.12
13.00@109.81 (Launched @1500 and bogged :(
12.73@109.33 (Unhappy Coyote Mustang)
12.70@109.17
12.67@107.30


Density Altitude:1975

Corrected ET
12.38@111.73
Click to expand...
Why are the 2013+ car faster the 12 and older cars?
 
That info is incorrect Swamp....

See/Refer below:


Livernois Motorsports said:
Not sure why people keep saying there was an upgrade? The HPFP are exactly the same between a 2010 and a 2013 SHO.

If you order a pump for a 2010 car today the number will cross reference to a 2013. It has an updated number but ford does this on tons of parts.

The flow, pressure and internals are identical. There is no upgrade for 2013.

DM
Click to expand...
 
bpd1151 said:
That info is incorrect Swamp....

See/Refer below:


Livernois Motorsports said:
Not sure why people keep saying there was an upgrade? The HPFP are exactly the same between a 2010 and a 2013 SHO.

If you order a pump for a 2010 car today the number will cross reference to a 2013. It has an updated number but ford does this on tons of parts.

The flow, pressure and internals are identical. There is no upgrade for 2013.

DM
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


All of the fuel delivery system is Controlled by the newer ECM / ECU and completely revised  parameters and programming of the 13 plus models .
This is why the 13 + can handle E85 blending , whereas the older ones cannot .
This is what I was referring to.
 
Nice times!!  What all did you do to your car (besides the tune and the E-85)?  I think I remember you were running a 3 Bar (almost positive with those times) but do you have downpipes?

Thanks!
 
bpd1151 said:
That info is incorrect Swamp....

See/Refer below:


Livernois Motorsports said:
Not sure why people keep saying there was an upgrade? The HPFP are exactly the same between a 2010 and a 2013 SHO.

If you order a pump for a 2010 car today the number will cross reference to a 2013. It has an updated number but ford does this on tons of parts.

The flow, pressure and internals are identical. There is no upgrade for 2013.

DM
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
High pressure side is same low pressure is upgraded.
 
ecoboostsho said:
Nice times!!  What all did you do to your car (besides the tune and the E-85)?  I think I remember you were running a 3 Bar (almost positive with those times) but do you have downpipes?

Thanks!
Click to expand...
No downpipes. Tune and sensor.

And corn.
 
Blending down to 25 % made a huge difference in fueling headroom and power.

Incidentally, this was also the blend the car liked best stock.

 
shoman04 said:
FoMoCoSHO said:
Tonight's results

Out of the gate...
12.66@109.14
12.70@109.65
12.67@109.12
13.00@109.81 (Launched @1500 and bogged :(
12.73@109.33 (Unhappy Coyote Mustang)
12.70@109.17
12.67@107.30


Density Altitude:1975

Corrected ET
12.38@111.73
Click to expand...
Why are the 2013+ car faster the 12 and older cars?
Click to expand...
What is crazy is that my car tipped the scales at 4690. Now that was at municipal  dump so idk exactly how accurate that is...
 
So, how does fueling up working with this tune?

Do you have to visit the E85 and 91 pumps each time?  What if you are lazy and just fill the tank up with 91 octane?
 
PokerMunkee said:
So, how does fueling up working with this tune?

Do you have to visit the E85 and 91 pumps each time?  What if you are lazy and just fill the tank up with 91 octane?
Click to expand...
I have several 5 gallon tanks that I fill up with e98 that way I can just put in what I need then go to the gas station.
 
PokerMunkee said:
So, how does fueling up working with this tune?

Do you have to visit the E85 and 91 pumps each time?  What if you are lazy and just fill the tank up with 91 octane?
Click to expand...
I let it get under1/4 then fill up with 93 to 70% via Torque then top off with the corn, right about 5 gallons. As things are now I see no reason to exceed 25 percent as there seems to be no extra benefit just extra strain on fuel headroom. I'm around 97.5 octane and the last log showed a tad of negative kr @ wot logged with the SCT x4.
 
Damnit. Now I'm going to find out what the 12's can do with corn. I'll start with E18 (2 gallons) and see how it acts
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
2015 Firebird Raceway Boise Idaho
Replies
10
Views
10K
Airbornemaikai
A
Back
Top