New best last night.

SHOboat88

New member
Went to the track last night. Got a new best.  Can wait for the weather too cool off.  Made 4 for 5 passes all of them were 12.7s.  Best pass was 12.70@110

Mods are magnaflow mufflers, 3rd cat and res. Delete,  t stat, 3 bar map sensor, and  lms 93 tune.

I tried posting a picture of the time slips it won't let me for some reason.
 
Those are awesome times for basically a tuned only SHO.  What were other cars doing?  Always good to see how the competition is running in the same conditions.

I can't wait to tune mine!!
 
Here are the time slips.  I have a buddy with a tune only 2013 SHO also.  Last night he ran a best of 12.98@105.  His car has been 12.77 so the weather wasn't the best
 
I also did some testing. I  have a k & n cai that I did some back to back testing with.  I picked up nothing at all.  Then put my stock intake back on and ran the best two passes 12.71 & 12.70. Mph seemed better with the stock intake but that was later in the night and it might have just been getting cooler.
 
SHOboat88 said:
I also did some testing. I  have a k & n cai that I did some back to back testing with.  I picked up nothing at all.  Then put my stock intake back on and ran the best two passes 12.71 & 12.70. Mph seemed better with the stock intake but that was later in the night and it might have just been getting cooler.

Good confirmation SHOboat!  This is exactly in line with the dyno testing we did on my '13 SHO where we found no difference with factory intake and filter vs no intake or filter.  Several members have also reported going back to stock from AiRaid and K&N because of slower times with the aftermarket CAIs. Currently there is no evidence that CAI improves the performance of our 3.5EB engines.  They do change the sound and underwood appearance for those seeking those mods.

MDesigns (Spartn27) has a new concept involved in the one he is offering that no other product uses... Hopefully dyno/track will prove the idea.... IMHO It is also the best eye candy available in a CAI by a longshot.
 
BiGMaC said:
SHOboat88 said:
I also did some testing. I  have a k & n cai that I did some back to back testing with.  I picked up nothing at all.  Then put my stock intake back on and ran the best two passes 12.71 & 12.70. Mph seemed better with the stock intake but that was later in the night and it might have just been getting cooler.

Good confirmation SHOboat!  This is exactly in line with the dyno testing we did on my '13 SHO where we found no difference with factory intake and filter vs no intake or filter.  Several members have also reported going back to stock from AiRaid and K&N because of slower times with the aftermarket CAIs. Currently there is no evidence that CAI improves the performance of our 3.5EB engines.  They do change the sound and underwood appearance for those seeking those mods.

MDesigns (Spartn27) has a new concept involved in the one he is offering that no other product uses... Hopefully dyno/track will prove the idea.... IMHO It is also the best eye candy available in a CAI by a longshot.
I also did some testing on Friday at the track . Ran two times with airaid cai 13.09 @ 102 1.9 60' . then ran stock air box with knn drop in 13.08 @102  1.87 60' . All runs were 30 minutes apart and stalled at 2k rpm. This was in humid 85 degree weather.

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

 
Thanks  everyone.  I was definitely pump when my first pass was a 12.76. I will make some one a good deal on a k & n cai lol.
 
southtxSHO said:
BiGMaC said:
SHOboat88 said:
I also did some testing. I  have a k & n cai that I did some back to back testing with.  I picked up nothing at all.  Then put my stock intake back on and ran the best two passes 12.71 & 12.70. Mph seemed better with the stock intake but that was later in the night and it might have just been getting cooler.

Good confirmation SHOboat!  This is exactly in line with the dyno testing we did on my '13 SHO where we found no difference with factory intake and filter vs no intake or filter.  Several members have also reported going back to stock from AiRaid and K&N because of slower times with the aftermarket CAIs. Currently there is no evidence that CAI improves the performance of our 3.5EB engines.  They do change the sound and underwood appearance for those seeking those mods.

MDesigns (Spartn27) has a new concept involved in the one he is offering that no other product uses... Hopefully dyno/track will prove the idea.... IMHO It is also the best eye candy available in a CAI by a longshot.
I also did some testing on Friday at the track . Ran two times with airaid cai 13.09 @ 102 1.9 60' . then ran stock air box with knn drop in 13.08 @102  1.87 60' . All runs were 30 minutes apart and stalled at 2k rpm. This was in humid 85 degree weather.

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Very! VERY!! VERY!!! Good Times. Almost broke the best tune only time. My car at 59deg and 4160lb (the lites car in two forums) 12.669. Or Steve 142858 at 41deg, DA -300, AND MagaFlow Cat-back exhaust. 12.599 (He CHEATED)
55_26_08_13_12_03_23.jpeg
 
Back
Top