Random thoughts for the day

lamrith said:
Brucelinc said:
The "attachments and other options" doesn't seem to work for me.
That is a dealership loaner?  nice, aftermarket intake and window decals.
The pics are mine and posted a couple to make sure the feature is working.  Z  :)
 
ZSHO said:
lamrith said:
Brucelinc said:
The "attachments and other options" doesn't seem to work for me.
That is a dealership loaner?  nice, aftermarket intake and window decals.
The pics are mine and posted a couple to make sure the feature is working.  Z  :)
OK, that just proves that I am overworked, tired and need to go home for the day.  Mistake your post for Bruce..  yikes..
 
lamrith said:
ZSHO said:
lamrith said:
Brucelinc said:
The "attachments and other options" doesn't seem to work for me.
That is a dealership loaner?  nice, aftermarket intake and window decals.
The pics are mine and posted a couple to make sure the feature is working.  Z  :)
OK, that just proves that I am overworked, tired and need to go home for the day.  Mistake your post for Bruce..  yikes..
Its all Good!! I sometimes have trouble to Decipher from Text through emotions but its all in good terms. Z
 
I can get the jpg in the window by "choose file" but not into the actual post.  Does something have to be enabled or am I just as stupid as I look?
 
Attachments will only post as thumbnails at the bottom of the post.  If you want to take it one step further, you have to then open the attachment for viewing, grab the link address, then post that address back in the body of the post, like you normally would with any external site.  Helps to put the IMG tag around the images though, not as friendly on this site as the DIRECT LINK on photobucket.  So first the "open tag" i.e. "<IMG>" then the link address then the "close tag" i.e. "</IMG>" minus all the " of course :)

Yeah, a bit of effort.
 
Brucelinc said:
I can get the jpg in the window by "choose file" but not into the actual post.  Does something have to be enabled or am I just as stupid as I look?
Brucelinc,
Drop me a PM, you can email me the images and I will get them posted for you if you want.
 
lamrith said:
Brucelinc said:
I can get the jpg in the window by "choose file" but not into the actual post.  Does something have to be enabled or am I just as stupid as I look?
Brucelinc,
Drop me a PM, you can email me the images and I will get them posted for you if you want.

Thanks but I was just trying to see how to do it.  I don't need to post a picture now but I will at some point.  I have always used photobucket but I am not paying them $400.
 
I had a PP SHO for a loaner yesterday.  I enjoyed driving it but was surprised at how firm the suspension is compared to my Continental.  As awesome as SHOs are with tuning, driving a stock one was a bit underwhelming.  Brake boosting for all it was worth, I couldn't break the tires loose on pavement.  Seemed like there was quite a bit of turbo lag, too. 

On the bright side, these cars are very comfortable, quiet and solid feeling.  It is the tune the puts icing on the cake, though!  I am not telling you guys anything you didn't already know but this was the first SHO I have driven since the gen 4 was introduced for the 2010 model year.
 
Weird because attaching pictures never works for me on this forum. And my photobucket pictures are still working. IDK. Maybe I am special?
 
Brucelinc said:
I had a PP SHO for a loaner yesterday.  I enjoyed driving it but was surprised at how firm the suspension is compared to my Continental.  As awesome as SHOs are with tuning, driving a stock one was a bit underwhelming.  Brake boosting for all it was worth, I couldn't break the tires loose on pavement.  Seemed like there was quite a bit of turbo lag, too. 

On the bright side, these cars are very comfortable, quiet and solid feeling.  It is the tune the puts icing on the cake, though!  I am not telling you guys anything you didn't already know but this was the first SHO I have driven since the gen 4 was introduced for the 2010 model year.

I'll agree with you on that one.  The PP rides hard.  My terminator has steeda sport lowering springs and it still rides way softer.  It's too bad Ford didn't do some sort of variable dampening.  It's almost like they said "aww just crank the spring rates way the hell up there."
 
Yeah the PP do ride hard.  That's why I was very surprised how little difference there was between the stock springs and the H&R's.
 
bamsho said:
Yeah the PP do ride hard.  That's why I was very surprised how little difference there was between the stock springs and the H&R's.

I'm pretty happy with the adjustable firmness options in my MKS.  It only has 3 settings, but it gets the job done.  Full soft is a bit floaty, middle setting is best 90% of the time, and full firm is great when driving aggressively.  I'm kind of surprised that they didn't include the adjustable dampeners in the SHO.
 
I wish they made some similar covers for the Ecoboost Platform. Z.
2015-17 MUSTANG BILLET ALUMINUM ENGINE COMPARTMENT CAP COVER SET W/ LASER ENGRAVED FORD PERFORMANCE .
170.00-set
GXaieJ0h.jpg


https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6766-M50?cks=432128850&emailid=FP_FASTNEWS
 
ZSHO said:
I wish they made some similar covers for the Ecoboost Platform. Z.
2015-17 MUSTANG BILLET ALUMINUM ENGINE COMPARTMENT CAP COVER SET W/ LASER ENGRAVED FORD PERFORMANCE .
170.00-set
GXaieJ0h.jpg


https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6766-M50?cks=432128850&emailid=FP_FASTNEWS

I agree!

Here are Shelby caps (not cap covers) for a 2v Mustang on the coolant reservoir and oil fill spout. 

TNGkhse.jpg


The dipstick handle and brake reservoir cap did not fit, but at least it dressed it up a bit.  Would like to find out if there's a Mustang dipstick and brake cap that cross over.
 
Back
Top