Thermostats - Reische vs Evenflo - vs Stock?

AJP turbo said:
That single scalar you are seeing and using I think for the fan on/off point isn't the only thing that controls the fans....There are tables for TOT(trans oil) and A/C head pressure

I've seen some KR reduction with people with stats but sometimes it's hard to isolate because of fuel quality or pressure drops or spikes or afr changes.

Having the cylinder heads a little cooler will not hurt nor will having cooler plugs which extract more heat from the chamber and head

Chevy gaybalt is irrelevant in this piece

The coolant drops as you stated at just after your run not because the cooling system doing it's job but because you aren't  feeding the engine gasoline and creating violent explosions.

I see SHO's in 10f degree ambient temps with a 170 stat go over 200 on wot runs.
IIRC my 160 has been hitting 205 where it used to hit 230.

I had this stat in for 2 weeks on the stock calibration with no cel and multiple dealer trips...no issues.

It may take a little warmer to warm up but but the difference is so small, its really hard to tell. Nothing a little boost, heated seats, and steering wheel can't compensate for.
 
After doing a lot more reading on this, I'll give the Reische Ford 4D 170 a try mainly because it is a modified cold-side t-stat like the stock RT-1228 (and not a modified hot-side t-stat like the Evenflo).

Plus, it's only 10 degrees lower than the stock RT-1228 (Not sure why RockAuto lists it as 190, but everyone says the stock is 180). With my setpoint set to 200F, I think it's almost perfect for the 180 t-stat, and maybe I won't need to change it for the Reische. The 160F t-stat sounds enticing, but the cold-side t-stat does look like a much better design with the bypass system - and in theory it seems like the 170 should not have an impact on warmup in the winter. I plan to just keep the current ECU settings and see how the 170F t-stat by itself performs. My guess is that as long as I am moving, the cooling system will do its job to lower the ECT/CHT even more than what I see now.

When removing the t-stat housing, is any coolant supposed to be removed out of the degas bottle first? It seems like the housing is lower than the degas bottle even with the coolant at the lowest mark, and would result in a lot of coolant dropping out?
 
metroplex said:
When removing the t-stat housing, is any coolant supposed to be removed out of the degas bottle first? It seems like the housing is lower than the degas bottle even with the coolant at the lowest mark, and would result in a lot of coolant dropping out?

If you're careful and keep the housing tied up high, you won't lose much. However, I walked away to find a different container to catch what comes out of the block and my housing dropped down and drained about a half gallon onto my driveway. Oops!

Removing some from the degas bottle may have minimized my loss in that case, but if I had been more careful to zip tie up the housing, I don't think I would have lost much.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The stock oem Motorcraft stat is 180 part  Number: 8575(RT-1172)
http://www.fordparts.com/Commerce/PartDetail.aspx?n=D%2bB8vbIfO8iNgFCxYWS8Vw%3d%3d&id=405563689&m=2&search=true&year=2013&make=Ford&model=Taurus 
NVY83Arh.jpg



Here is a pic of my oem stat below.  Z
57zF5z3h.jpg
 
According to Reische's site, the RT1228 is the latest 180F (RT1172 looks like an older part number):
http://reischeperformance.com/AppGuide.html

RockAuto's catalog shows RT1228 to be the Motorcraft standard t-stat for the SHO, but their catalog incorrectly labels it as a 190F thermostat.

Also, this eBay auction shows the OEM parts catalog t-stat Ford part number associated with RT1228:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ford-Motorcraft-RT1228-OEM-Engine-Coolant-Thermostat-1X4Z-8575-A-No-Gasket-/122043894369?fits=Make%3ALincoln%7CModel%3AMKX&hash=item1c6a620a61:g:hqEAAOSwbsBXkA8T&vxp=mtr

So which is correct? I think either way, the stock t-stat is 180F and the Reische 4D is 170F with the Evenflo at 160F?
 
I said I'll give the 4D a try and see how it effects ECT and CHT. I'm still not 100% sold on the idea mainly because I haven't found any data to convince me. And no one's grasping at straws, it helps to know the baseline.
 
If everything is set up properly then a 10 degree cooler stat will lower average temps by 10 degree...its a simple regulator...one allows coolant to flow at 180 and another 160 or 170

You have a tendency to over cook things and micro analyze with everything you post....not a good or bad thing

The stat is a piece of the puzzle that helps you maintain a desired temp but needs to be in concert with radiator cooling capacity, tune settings

Can use any stat you want but if the rad is too small then it wont work without the assistance of fans...if the rad was large enough you wouldnt need fans moving or not driving

If your desired temp is 150 it wont matter how big the rad is or how fast your fans spin if your stat doesnt open til 190..
 
metroplex said:
I said I'll give the 4D a try and see how it effects ECT and CHT. I'm still not 100% sold on the idea mainly because I haven't found any data to convince me. And no one's grasping at straws, it helps to know the baseline.

I'll be interested to see your data once you complete the comparison for yourself. The tstat is one thing I did not do a before/after comparison, but conceptually, it made sense to me, so it seemed like the right thing to do for relatively little cost. Keep us posted! :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
AJP turbo said:
That single scalar you are seeing and using I think for the fan on/off point isn't the only thing that controls the fans....There are tables for TOT(trans oil) and A/C head pressure

I've seen some KR reduction with people with stats but sometimes it's hard to isolate because of fuel quality or pressure drops or spikes or afr changes.

Having the cylinder heads a little cooler will not hurt nor will having cooler plugs which extract more heat from the chamber and head

Chevy gaybalt is irrelevant in this piece

The coolant drops as you stated at just after your run not because the cooling system doing it's job but because you aren't  feeding the engine gasoline and creating violent explosions.

I see SHO's in 10f degree ambient temps with a 170 stat go over 200 on wot runs.
Please refrain from using such words. Z
 
If you've read my previous posts, you'll see the big difference was when the fans were set to turn on.  Mine are around 190 now, but I would actually prefer 185 with the 170 TS I'm using now. 

I tried both the 160 and 170 TS with LMS TS fan settings.  The 160 was all over the place for daily driving and actually hotter at the highest temp. 

The 170 wouldn't get as cold, but was more consistent and had a lower high temp.  I did a lot of testing and found that if the fans run too much or all the time, it kept the intake fluid too cold (radiating to the thermostat) therefore the thermostat would not open all the way soon enough causing the temps to spike.  With the 170 my car seems to like running between 174 to 184 most of the time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
JMR76 said:
If you've read my previous posts, you'll see the big difference was when the fans were set to turn on.  Mine are around 190 now, but I would actually prefer 185 with the 170 TS I'm using now. 

I tried both the 160 and 170 TS with LMS TS fan settings.  The 160 was all over the place for daily driving and actually hotter at the highest temp. 

I think the 160 Evenflo/LMS t-stat is just a modified hot-side t-stat, so the bypass part isn't the same. I thought I read the 160 would basically try to open/close repeatedly in certain conditions causing the erratic reading/behavior. The cold-side t-stat, like the factory unit or Reische 4D, has that bypass part that allows coolant to flow, and as it opens, the heat motor is shrouded by the bypass valve preventing the erratic behavior.

Do you find your fans to turn on more often with it set to 190?
I plan to keep it set to 200F initially and see how the ECT/CHT are affected by just the 170 t-stat. My theory is that the 170 t-stat will open up sooner and allow the cooling system to do its job without the use of the fans while the car is moving because it would be fully open by 190F and my setpoint is 200F. That would be confirmed if I see the ECT/CHT at speed about 10F or more colder than what I've seen with the stock (190-195F ECT in single digit winter temps). So at the track, as the car is moving down the dragstrip, airflow and the cooling system should keep the engine colder than before - without the use of the fans. But that's just something I need to look into with data.
 
metroplex said:
My theory is that the 170 t-stat will open up sooner and allow the cooling system to do its job without the use of the fans while the car is moving because it would be fully open by 190F and my setpoint is 200F.

Also, don't overlook the fact that a lower temp stat will stay open longer, allowing for lower coolant temps, during periods of no load (coasting).

As I said in my previous post, coasting from 70MPH to 0 over 22 seconds allowed my coolant temp to drop from 185F to 171F (with a 170 stat). The OE unit would have closed earlier, keeping temps closer to 180F leaving the coolant with less ability to absorb additional heat.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
metroplex said:
JMR76 said:
If you've read my previous posts, you'll see the big difference was when the fans were set to turn on.  Mine are around 190 now, but I would actually prefer 185 with the 170 TS I'm using now. 

I tried both the 160 and 170 TS with LMS TS fan settings.  The 160 was all over the place for daily driving and actually hotter at the highest temp. 

I think the 160 Evenflo/LMS t-stat is just a modified hot-side t-stat, so the bypass part isn't the same. I thought I read the 160 would basically try to open/close repeatedly in certain conditions causing the erratic reading/behavior. The cold-side t-stat, like the factory unit or Reische 4D, has that bypass part that allows coolant to flow, and as it opens, the heat motor is shrouded by the bypass valve preventing the erratic behavior.

Do you find your fans to turn on more often with it set to 190?
I plan to keep it set to 200F initially and see how the ECT/CHT are affected by just the 170 t-stat. My theory is that the 170 t-stat will open up sooner and allow the cooling system to do its job without the use of the fans while the car is moving because it would be fully open by 190F and my setpoint is 200F. That would be confirmed if I see the ECT/CHT at speed about 10F or more colder than what I've seen with the stock (190-195F ECT in single digit winter temps). So at the track, as the car is moving down the dragstrip, airflow and the cooling system should keep the engine colder than before - without the use of the fans. But that's just something I need to look into with data.



The 190F fan setting seems to work good.  The original settings were lower, around 180 I think and my fans would pretty much always run.  Even more in the winter which was strange. 

The fans don't run a lot with the 170F TS and 190F fan settings, allowing the coolant to flow and cool more by itself.

I experience issues when the fan settings are too low and turn on before the TS is fully open.  Seems to get stuck at a higher engine temp as the intake flow is ice cold before it opens. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Also, from my testing, the 170F TS likes to run between 172-184F without fans.  So with the 190F  fan settings the fans don't run as much. 

I would seriously want fans to start at 185 and off around 175 but they wouldn't do that at this time.  I am still happy with the 190F settings though.  At this setting, the fans barely run during the winter at all.

If your worried about the fans running all the time, I would ask LMS to set them at 190 first.  If your not satisfied you could them go to 200F.

PS. Don't use the 160F TS Unless your only tracking the car.  It's a good quality TS, but not the proper one for our vehicle.  The Reiche 170F is the one I decided to keep after numerous testing.  You can also PM me if you have more questions. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Thanks! I did research on the cold side vs hot side issue and agree that the Reische is the better design as it matches the oem tstat. I have been running my own tune so it's not hard for me to change the setpoint setting. What does your ect tend to read in the summer without the fans running?
 
metroplex said:
Thanks! I did research on the cold side vs hot side issue and agree that the Reische is the better design as it matches the oem tstat. I have been running my own tune so it's not hard for me to change the setpoint setting. What does your ect tend to read in the summer without the fans running?


If I'm cruising my ect usually stays around 180-185 without fans.  Letting off gas and running downhill it'll dip down around 172.  Idling and heavy traffic it'll go up over 190 after a while and the fans kick in and cool it right back down.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
metroplex said:
My 4D arrived and I tested it. It starts to open at 164F and is fully open by 176F. Does this sound typical?

Sounds reasonable for a 170 stat. I'm guessing this was in a pot of water, so you could observe? Does your thermometer read 212 in boiling water and 32 in ice water?

Depending on the sensitivity of your thermometer, you will probably also pick up a temp difference at the bottom of the pot (closer to the heating element) vs the surface of the water.

Once it opens, you could remove the pot from heat and let the water cool and see when it fully closes again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I installed it, took just over 30 minutes. I extracted all of the degas bottle coolant (about 0.5-0.75 gal, it's a fairly large bottle for what appears to be a small reservoir) and not much coolant came out of the housing area. The stock t-stat was really jammed in the housing/block and was probably the hardest part of the whole procedure. The O-ring gasket looks to be the same RG-571 that we use in the old 2V modulars and the 3V modulars.

Mike, yea I just used a pot of water. I did repeat the test and got about the same results.

The stock factory t-stat had a little plunger bleeder valve while the Reische did not have one. The stock t-stat also had some type of rubber coating on the internal valve of the t-stat.
 
Back
Top