Wagner OEx pads

Scott4957

New member
Anyone know anything about these? They say they will stop a vehical up to 50ft shorter than OEM pads. I assume "up to" is likely a best case and from what speed I have no idea because from 60 that would be impossible.
 
*Results based on 60 MPH post fade performance testing conducted by Link Engineering Company comparing Wagner Brake pads to competitor’s brake pads on the 2014 Ford F-150, 2011 Toyota RAV4 and 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe.

Who's the competitor?  That's a huge list to pick from ...  I think it was Raybestos that has a Police Interceptor brake pad that's supposed to be very good.  Z?
 
AJP turbo said:
Poop...im making the fart sound with my lips

LOL, this sounds like a very detailed and technical review. So 60-0 for the 2013 MKS is 120ft. How the hell to do they get off saying 50ft shorter? I don't know what the F150 is but it can't be much different. This brings up another question, has anyone that has done the EBC kits and other ever tested their 60-0? I would be happy with 15ft. If any rotor or pad took me down to 105 I would buy it in a second.

 
120 ft?

2013+ SHO manages the same in 106 ft, must be the extra poundage the MKS has to haul around.

I would like a pad and sticky tire combo that could get it down to double digits.
 
FoMoCoSHO said:
120 ft?

2013+ SHO manages the same in 106 ft, must be the extra poundage the MKS has to haul around.

I would like a pad and sticky tire combo that could get it down to double digits.

Hmmm, that was one number I came across, maybe I need to do more research.
 
FoMoCoSHO said:
120 ft?

2013+ SHO manages the same in 106 ft, must be the extra poundage the MKS has to haul around.

I would like a pad and sticky tire combo that could get it down to double digits.

I think only PP equipped cars have been tested by magazines.  Difference might be mostly between PP and non-PP.

Us MKS owners are basically driving a non-PP SHO.  Car is so heavy already that I'm not sure the weight difference matters much.
 
Back
Top