I dont think that's the case. you just have to tune to DI E85 strengths...which is scary to most because of its much different behavior when directly injected...It does not like being pig rich.StealBlueSho said:FoMoCoSHO said:I think we should have a head to head showdown, meth vs E50StealBlueSho said:Just a quick update... purely datapoints...
Livernois Motorsports Final Remote Alky Tune 0 - 90 mph = 8.7 seconds
AJPTurbo Work in Progress Remote Alky Tune 0 - 90 mph = 7.8 seconds (Assuming the wallace 1/8 mile calculator is right.. put me dangerously close to 11.9 in the 1/4... taken with a grain of salt as the internet lies.. according to Abraham Lincoln)
Neither of those were a brake boosted launch.. just an old man hitting the gas style..
Every change he makes to yours (spark and boost) he makes to mine.
The last log I saw looked like we were about the same settings...15 psi and high 26 spark.
Your calculator data is pretty exciting.
The calc is from Wallace Racing, I don't take much stalk in it...
I agree!! E50 vs Meth would be a good one I think... although, curious how much your throttle is closing to keep fuel pressure?
That makes a big difference in volumetric efficiency thus more power... you can actually see the STFT going rich when the throttle closes with meth spraying...
I think the 2013+ handle E much better...
Look closely at my most recent log, pay close attention to lambse. We're not done yet but I am pleased with the changes. I think we've delayed enrichment further since I posted that one.
I'm still running a bit more spark than your meth tune....IAT compensations are back to stock, K&N heater is back on. The corn doesn't care it just does more work. It works better with hotter temps.
I just compared one of Tophers logs, he starts with 13 degrees lower ambient but by the end of the multi my IAT2 is actually a couple degrees cooler.