Knock with stock tune at WOT.

Like FoMoCo pointed out, do you see a gearshift at the same time?  Is the SHO losing any power at the time the knock occurs?  If a gearshift is happening and there is no power loss, I would probably keep an eye on it, but not worry about it.
 
curry67 said:
I have a sct x4 I datalog with. I almost always see knock from 3 to 6 at wot for a split second.

Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk
Z is probably correct, but I do wonder about adequate function of fuel pumps... Maybe you're getting too lean for that instant.
 
curry67 said:
This knock is driving me nuts I feel like this isn't gonna work. I don't feel comfortable tuning it anymore.

Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk
Lol, dump some 87 in your tank on the stock tune.....

Your head will probably explode.

I wouldn't get too worked up, the car is very good at protecting itself.
 
I just don't think I should see any with 94 octane and 10 percent ethanol. It's top tier supposedly.

Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk

 
FoMoCoSHO said:
curry67 said:
This knock is driving me nuts I feel like this isn't gonna work. I don't feel comfortable tuning it anymore.

Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk
Lol, dump some 87 in your tank on the stock tune.....

Your head will probably explode.

I wouldn't get too worked up, the car is very good at protecting itself.

This is true...However, Fomo's head is a little more susceptible to explosions because it works overtime lol...

But not only is the ECU good at protecting itself but it also rides the edge of performance for a given fuel. That's the beauty of having knock sensors. You will never see an inactive knock sensor, remember that. I've also seen a lot of people misinterpret data logs when trying to diagnose a problem or even a perceived problem that doesn't even exist.

When you see knock sensor reading it's most likely not knocking but the PID is displaying how much timing was removed to prevent the knock from occurring so you can rest easy.

The benefit of having knock sensors it to keep the cars running consistent over long periods of time to compensate for changes in atmosphere, engine environment, fuel quality, physically degraded engine components
 
curry67 said:
I just don't think I should see any with 94 octane and 10 percent ethanol. It's top tier supposedly.

Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk

I've said this before but there will always be new people self diagnosing their own cars....Nothing wrong with that but it can be tough....Not saying this is always true but the average end user that has a tune or is stock can't see the entire situation.

I can make a tune and run 87 octane  and make it so the knock sensors are ADDING timing and you can have a tune where you run race fuel and the ECU will pull timing....It's all on how the base tables are set...If I set the tables with 15 degrees less than stock then even with 87 octane the ECU will add timing.

I know that some performance tunes simply add a few degrees of global timing then the result it more power and timing advance to whatever the fuel and situation can tolerate....If it can't tolerate it then you wiil see knock sensor retard
 
curry67 said:
So would thst explain higher knock readings on higher octane?

Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk

Maybe....But you really need to have someone verify on a log just to make sure that's really what you have. Then I would want to look for trends....5 and 6 is a little high...If it's an isolated event then no biggie. If it continues then your timing tables need work and are over advanced and you are relying on the knock sensors.

Take your device and under user options  retard the spark by 4 or 6 degrees and see if it's better...If it is then your spark tables are over advanced.

I like my knock sensor readings to be like my short term fuel trims.....They should hover around 0. A little above and below is good.
 
ajpturbo said:
curry67 said:
So would thst explain higher knock readings on higher octane?

Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk

Maybe....But you really need to have someone verify on a log just to make sure that's really what you have. Then I would want to look for trends....5 and 6 is a little high...If it's an isolated event then no biggie. If it continues then your timing tables need work and are over advanced and you are relying on the knock sensors.

Take your device and under user options  retard the spark by 4 or 6 degrees and see if it's better...If it is then your spark tables are over advanced.

I like my knock sensor readings to be like my short term fuel trims.....They should hover around 0. A little above and below is good.
Even on stock tune?

Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk

 
Log please..


Well it could've been isolated...Isolated could even mean a weekend or how long you had some fuel or how long a station had that fuel I dunno....

Seems like some of you folks from canadia land battle fuel troubles now and again eh?....And those cooler temps up there may lead to extra spark advance due to the IAT compensation tables...As IAT's are cooler the ECU will add some timing also
 
curry67 said:
ajpturbo said:
curry67 said:
So would thst explain higher knock readings on higher octane?

Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk

Maybe....But you really need to have someone verify on a log just to make sure that's really what you have. Then I would want to look for trends....5 and 6 is a little high...If it's an isolated event then no biggie. If it continues then your timing tables need work and are over advanced and you are relying on the knock sensors.

Take your device and under user options  retard the spark by 4 or 6 degrees and see if it's better...If it is then your spark tables are over advanced.

I like my knock sensor readings to be like my short term fuel trims.....They should hover around 0. A little above and below is good.
Even on stock tune?

Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk
X2 on that ?
 
Your Wot pulls are very short. Good data goes along way when logging....can be tough on the street though...I have my good secret places to log where I live.

Your not really giving the car time to settle into a nice pull. I did see one of the WOT pulls though where there was no knock sensor readings. Even though you had some knock sensor readings your timing did not look overly advanced. I saw spark around 13-16 degrees so that's fine....But you did have more knock sensor activity than I would expect to see on a stock tune. I wouldn't be worried but I would watch for trends and see if it continues.

Try and get a nice long pull if you can. at least 2 or 3 complete gears or 80 mph of acceleration. Give it time to pull and see how it looks and if the entire pull has knock sensor readings.

Some have had to do the knock sensor wire mod. I have my doubts on if that does anything but some say it helped them. These ECU's are so busy and dependent on environmental conditions I can see coincidence and timing of the wire mod playing a factor. I can't see vibration and noise appearing as high knock readings....Why not low? And if the wire is so bad it was grounding out on people then the knock sensor PID would just flatline I would guess. But I have seen what people call false knock or ghost knock as reported from knock sensor due to aftermarket cams that have noisy valve trains or metallic noises from exhausts having an effect.

You should try and flash and pull 6 degrees  or some dramatic amount like 10 to see if it's the tune...If it's not then you have a component or sensor failure maybe

That's what I see at this point...Does't look real bad though...Let the sensor do it's job..Or wait for a DTC....If you don't have a dtc it can't be that bad...This car basically has the ability to tell you if your farts contaminated your alcantara in the seats
 
I do see timing being retarded even at single-digit speeds, not just WOT.  All in 1st gear, seems the banks are not sync'd for some time before & after the timing is retarded.  In decel, after 3-1 downshift.

Assuming stock tune still.
 
Back
Top