New Best for the Big Girl

F

FoMoCoSHO

New member
Second run was fastest tonite...

13.31 @ 105.26 (VS GTO) 13.77 @ 101.88

Other runs (Edited, hopefully for clarity)

13.34 @ 104.85 (VS GTO) 13.88 @  102.53                                         
13.34 @ 105.21 (VS SHELBY, unsure if 12 or 13) 11.60 @ 122.65
13.33 @ 104.80 (VS 13 BMW 750 LI) 13.18 @ 111.41
13.38 @ 104.38 (VS 13 BMW 750 LI) 13.24 @ 111.06
13.45 @ 104.70 (VS 13 BMW 750 LI) 13.02 @ 111.77
13.39 @ 105.26 (VS 13 V6 STANG) 14.57 @ 96.26
13.36 @ 105.26 (VS Late 90's V-6 Camaro) 15.49 @ 88.34

Safety guy stopped me at the end of run two to make sure I had a helmet on and long sleeves, LOL. He had some kind words about her performance.

BMW driver was very surprised and asked me about launching cause he was having issues.
 
FoMoCoSHO said:
Second run was fastest tonite...

13.31 @ 105.26 (GTO)

Other runs

13.34 @ 104.85 (GTO)
13.34 @ 105.21 (SHELBY, unsure if 12 or 13)
13.33 @ 104.80 (13 BMW 750 LI)
13.38 @ 104.38 (13 BMW 750 LI)
13.45 @ 104.70 (13 BMW 750 LI)
13.39 @ 105.26 (13 V6 STANG)
13.36 @ 105.26 (Late 90's V-6 Camaro)

Safety guy stopped me at the end of run two to make sure I had a helmet on and long sleeves, LOL. He had some kind words about her performance.

BMW driver was very surprised and asked me about launching cause he was having issues.
Click to expand...

you don't know if your Shelby is a 2012 or a 2013 ? lol and a 13.34 for a GT500 ?!

are these your cars ? sorry I'm confused :)
 
ah I thought you owned a big list of random cars ha ha

nice run what are you modifications and specs on your car ?
 
I wish I wouldn't have left early last night.

Besides the dropping temps in the evening, I started out with 1/4 tank more fuel in the car.

I'm thinking with lower temps and running the fuel out I may have been able to shave a tenth or two.







 
9-11-14 results

13.07@104.07
13.08@104.80 (Now I'm like WTF?)
13.03@104.85 (OK, may be hope)
12.84@104.92 (Boom, there it is)
12.87@105.02
12.87@105.16
12.84@110.81(Look at that trap speed jump!)
13.01@104.18 (HEAT SOAK intake over 160, IAT 2 almost 190 called it a night)

DA 1447
Corrected 12.639 @ 112.623 MPH

Torque Max Data
Torque 375
HP      345
Knock  +1.5

So going by 1/4 mile times, (Torque seems to agree) roughly 100 TQ increase from stock, 93 HP

Thanks Torrie!
 
How in the world did you gain +5 mph in your trap speed, while chipping off only 2 hundredths of a second? That doesn't even seem possible.

Excellent times though. This is tune only (5th revision), on E (what, E25?), and with K&N panel? Correct?

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 
FoMoCoSHO said:
9-11-14 results

13.07@104.07
13.08@104.80 (Now I'm like WTF?)
13.03@104.85 (OK, may be hope)
12.84@104.92 (Boom, there it is)
12.87@105.02
12.87@105.16
12.84@110.81(Look at that trap speed jump!)
13.01@104.18 (HEAT SOAK intake over 160, IAT 2 almost 190 called it a night)

DA 1447
Corrected 12.639 @ 112.623 MPH

Torque Max Data
Torque 375
HP      345
Knock  +1.5

So going by 1/4 mile times, (Torque seems to agree) roughly 100 TQ increase from stock, 93 HP

Thanks Torrie!
Click to expand...


Love that 12.84  ... downpipes and the Exhaust Cutout should drop you a few tenths easily .....
 
IHeartGroceries said:
How in the world did you gain +5 mph in your trap speed, while chipping off only 2 hundredths of a second? That doesn't even seem possible.

Excellent times though. This is tune only (5th revision), on E (what, E25?), and with K&N panel? Correct?

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
The car was noticeably different on the top end for that run...

It was also the highest WTQ and WHP reading from Torque for the night.

I removed the panel and put a new oem back in a month or so ago.

Tuned for E-30
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
2015 Firebird Raceway Boise Idaho
Replies
10
Views
10K
Airbornemaikai
A
Back
Top