Livernois Motorsports 3.5 Ecoboost engine build with upgraded rods and pistons

The horsepower numbers listed are based on observations of failed engines that we've received at various different power levels. Based on the types of failures, along with the corresponding power levels these engines were at during the failures, we're able to draw up an estimate for the max power capabilities. Like any estimate it's an educated guess based on the data we have to work with. In this case seeing the modes of failure spread out across multiple engines gives a good indication of what the limits are.

Like anything though there are variables that affect these kinds of things, you can take a stock Big Block Chevy out of an old truck and add parts and Nitrous to it and make over 700hp, but how long realistically before it blow's up. I think the term "ticking time bomb" is probably most appropriate in that scenario.

So this isn't to say that as soon as a 3.5L ecoboost hits 450whp for the first time it's guaranteed instant kaboom. But we do know that once you get around that horsepower number that we see a lot of failures in stock engines, so that must be right around the limit before things start failing. Knowing this we try and make an effort to educate the customer so they understand the implications of power at these levels, and that an engine failure at higher power levels like these with a stock engine is entirely possible and in fact likely to occur.

It's important to keep in mind that when the OEM is designing the engine they are only trying to meet the performance criteria for that specific application, while at the same time keeping costs as low as possible. So adding extra strength to components to handle power levels that exceed the stock power output is almost never an option. It would add cost in most cases and is unnessary, because to the OEM, they have no reason to worry about the engine beyond the stock power output. They'll design it to handle exactly the power output in factory form, then add a small percentage for a safety factor. This is why it's easy to get away with a mild tune and bolt on's on almost any stock vehicle. But as soon as you push outside of the smaller power gains over stock, you'll most likely be pushing the engine to it's limits in stock form.

Attached are some photo's of some recent builds, as well as some shots of the machine and engine shop.

Thanks



- edited by 4DRHTRD to fix the title - was ernoise changed to Livernois
 
This topic has been moved under your vendor threads.
The move is not a slight against you or your company. We appreciate all of the research you are doing, and the time you put into our EB engines, but until evidence of your claims is posted this is purely subjective, not "news".

Your company is not alone. All of the vendors are now being held to a standard of a zero-tolerance policy for unsubstantiated claims. If you are going to make a claim as a vendor, you must also post the scientific findings or empirical data that have lead you to that claim.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in moving forward.

-JimiJak
 
SRT82ECOBOOST said:
And here we go again.
maybe it needs to be put like this for you: leave the forum if wanting to understand there claims feel free. There is nothing wrong with it. And if you recall i was the first to be pissed off that they were taken off venders so I'm not bashing them. Its understanding more of what they come out with thats all. Well there are some that have done their work and contest their clams but that should be fine too right? not to you
 
Livernoise, I'm excited to see you guys are looking to sustain and improve the longevity of these engines.

Keep up the good work!
 
LMS  basically stated that all of us need to be conservative with our/their tunes to protect us from possible engine failure. Push an engine to its extreme limits and try to attempt any kind of longevity with this approach and you will be buying a lot of new parts. This is not new ground that they are referencing, so I don't understand confusion.
 
2010SHOtime said:
Livernoise, I'm excited to see you guys are looking to sustain and improve the longevity of these engines.

Keep up the good work!

I couldn't agree more! I just hope we're able to take a more active role in the process as well.
 
JimiJak said:
2010SHOtime said:
Livernoise, I'm excited to see you guys are looking to sustain and improve the longevity of these engines.

Keep up the good work!

I couldn't agree more! I just hope we're able to take a more active role in the process as well.
Not going to happen with the people that don't want to see proof on what they say. And that the funny part why don't they want know where that company is coming from its a big company and just wanting more info
 
explorergotoluvit said:
I hope i get my question answered up top of this post by them and not get caught up in your [SRT82ECOBOOST] bullsh*t that is all over there post now
You certainly have a way with words. In due time I would be willing to bet that LMS will answer your questions as they have consistently done on this forum.
 
No need to get personal or vulgar.

I think the frustration comes from being ridiculed for ASKING the questions for LMS to answer.
 
I have Lms stuff and so far im loving it. So it the nice people that are backing LMS post with nothing and getting in the way of the people that want to know more. LOL what is wrong with conversations with the ones that made the post why do i have to keep talk to that ones that aren't answering my questions and make this wonderful post that LMS made and know there a bunch of crap on here. AMAZING
 
Discussing technology, asking "Why", raising the collective "IQ" is an important part of this forum.  Advocate your position with facts & figures, or personal experience.  Feel free to respond when someone asks you to clarify, no fingers are being pointed.  It is your right to believe what you want to believe.  Draw your own conclusions. 

If data cannot be shared due to classification as company secrets or proprietary etc, say so and leave it at that.  Again, nobody is pointing fingers.  BUT, be aware that appropriate importance cannot be given to statements using data that is not openly available for analysis.  Trust is a good thing, but that is a personal choice.  It is not a defensible position by itself.
 
explorergotoluvit said:
I have Lms stuff and so far im loving it. So it the nice people that are backing LMS post with nothing and getting in the way of the people that want to know more. LOL what is wrong with conversations with the ones that made the post why do i have to keep talk to that ones that aren't answering my questions and make this wonderful post that LMS made and know there a bunch of crap on here. AMAZING
Nothing is wrong with questions,conversations, or spirited debate as long as a level of decorum is maintained.

 
I fail to see any unfounded claims here, we are certainly left in the dark here as to how much horsepower can be reliably had with these new pistons and rods. But that is very scary territory, to get into claims like that. This is a very young engine platform and we have to accept that sometimes we are dealing with unknowns.

I think anyone considering this product knows that and accepts that they may blow up their engine if they overestimate what they can do with it. I think anyone getting as far as the horsepower numbers to warrant this product knows full-well what they are getting into.
 
Back
Top