AJPTurbo boost regulator mod with EcoPowerParts charge pipes

MiWiAu said:
derfdog15 said:
I think the MBC route is a nice option for a car that may need fine tuning between the spring combinations, or for eaking out just a bit more power BUT as mentioned for a DD type of car, I think it may be overkill. Would be a nice option for a race-tune type of setup.

Per AJP's request, I am swapping to the 15.95 spring pressure combo, and running a slightly higher E percentage than I have been running. I will keep the thread updated once I get the next set of logging done. This is partially also to see some more insight can be shed on the predicament that MiWiAu has with his spring combos

Woot. Looking forward to your results!

At some point, I'm also planning to catalog the free length, spring rates, and install preloads of the springs in my kit. Tial hasn't been very helpful in providing nominal values, but at least we'll have a single point of reference.

Also, FYI, I ordered some parts to MacGyver (or possibly MacGruber) a spring preload adjuster for the Tial, but it will take some time to receive everything. I also need to measure the internal clearances on the MV-S from the diaphragm to the bottom side of the cap to see how much room I have for my mechanism when the valve is open and springs are compressed.

What I'm thinking is making a preload adjuster that will thread in through the center cap threads and interface only with the small diameter gate spring.

Using the alternative spring chart I posted earlier, every single Tial pressure option has an alternate spring combo that utilizes a small diameter spring. If this works, it would allow you to alter the spring preload on the small spring to fine tune the cracking pressure without having to modify the boost reference with a MBC.

Of course, this will only be possible if there is sufficient clearance in the gate once the valve has been actuated and the springs don't sack out when additional preload is added...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sounds like an interesting idea, keep us posted!

AJP turbo said:
derfdog15 said:
I think the MBC route is a nice option for a car that may need fine tuning between the spring combinations, or for eaking out just a bit more power BUT as mentioned for a DD type of car, I think it may be overkill. Would be a nice option for a race-tune type of setup.

Per AJP's request, I am swapping to the 15.95 spring pressure combo, and running a slightly higher E percentage than I have been running. I will keep the thread updated once I get the next set of logging done. This is partially also to see some more insight can be shed on the predicament that MiWiAu has with his spring combos

But the thing is, is I can change target boost by whatever. A single KPA to get closer or further away from the spring rating of the Gate mod. So there really isn't a need for the MBC....Steal blue was using the MBC to make his own adjustments so he didn't have to bother me which he really wasn't lol

Gotcha, I'll let you do the hard work then, and I'll just drive the heck out of it ;p
 
AJP turbo said:
But the thing is, is I can change target boost by whatever. A single KPA to get closer or further away from the spring rating of the Gate mod. So there really isn't a need for the MBC....Steal blue was using the MBC to make his own adjustments so he didn't have to bother me which he really wasn't lol

Hmm... maybe you can convince me that I'm wasting my time with this preload idea.

On my Explorer, the 15.95 and both 17.4 spring combos were causing the gate to hang open on shifts when we were at 14PSI target boost, and the 18.85 spring combo didn't actuate at all on the 1-2 shift until we bumped the target boost to 14.5PSI.

Even then, my fuel pressure at the 1-2 shift was dropping to ~1100 psi vs ~1900 psi at the 2-3 shift. Granted, this was with an ambient temp of 8.6*F LOL, so pressures will probably improve with warmer temps.

It seems to be shaping up that my spring settings are somewhat of an outlier, but here's my general question: wouldn't it be more ideal to tune to max boost and spark allowed by KR and fuel pressure, then dial in the boost regulator (for further improvements with fuel, MAP, and KR) with spring preload, rather than try to tune the regulator with desired boost? It seems like the latter may force a decision between too much boost required to actuate the regulator (and lower fuel/higher KR) or running lower boost to not overpower the gate springs and thus compromising optimal power output.

At least in my particular situation, I'm thinking my optimized spring combo is somewhere between my 17.4 and 18.85 springs, and going to the lower spring combo with a slight increase in preload might help improve the fuel pressure drop on my 1-2 shift.

I guess it depends on one's definition of "ideal" solution. One way (preload or MBC) is relatively high effort for the end user compared to tweaking the target boost, and it would also have the potential to remove another variable from the control of the tuner, which I could see being a potential issue as well by increasing the possibility of user error.

I guess I will proceed on this preload thing with caution, unless you tell me it's a dumb idea. :)





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Here is a pic of my boost reference line/vacuum reference line for anyone that needs it. This is from when I had just the boost gauge hooked up. Since install of the wastegate and bov I ran a 3/8" fuel line to a cross near the firewall a d have grabbed reference for all items (bov, wastegate, and boost gauge) from the cross.
 
Looking forward to results, MiWiAu.    Probably won't affect the MAP readings, but would like to have field data to bear that out.  Good point about the appearance cover.  Run nekked!!!
 
MiWiAu said:
Thanks, derf.

I bit the bullet and decided to go the more expensive route, with the hopes of added convenience: http://www.stage3motorsports.com//TS-0720-1005-2013-2016-F150-3-5L-EcoBoost-Turbosmart-MAP-Sensor-Boost-Reference-Adapter.html

I contacted Turbosmart directly, and they basically said it would probably work, and that I shouldn't have any issues with still fitting the engine cover. Guess we'll see soon. LOL

I assume that is being used for the OE 2 bar that we switch to a 3 bar? Since it only has one bolt hole shown. Do they include hardware as well?

I am going to try to run my wastegate from the TIP, as AJP did originally, as my boost is acting slightly odd currently, and the TIP pressure reference should be a few kPA higher. I will report back whether that makes it run better, etc.

I picked up 2 T's (1/4" pipe thread), some 1/4" to 1/4" nipples, and appropriate clamps, as well as a few pipe thread plugs. I am going to plug the port on my cross to the wastegate mod. Then use a T on the TIP reference. If the car runs better/AJP likes it more that way, I will turn the cross into a T permanently.

There is also a port on the bottom of the MAP sensor mount on the EPP charge piping, that I believe is 1/8" NPT. That may be another option in the future as well.

 
derfdog15 said:
I assume that is being used for the OE 2 bar that we switch to a 3 bar? Since it only has one bolt hole shown. Do they include hardware as well?

I am going to try to run my wastegate from the TIP, as AJP did originally, as my boost is acting slightly odd currently, and the TIP pressure reference should be a few kPA higher. I will report back whether that makes it run better, etc.

I picked up 2 T's (1/4" pipe thread), some 1/4" to 1/4" nipples, and appropriate clamps, as well as a few pipe thread plugs. I am going to plug the port on my cross to the wastegate mod. Then use a T on the TIP reference. If the car runs better/AJP likes it more that way, I will turn the cross into a T permanently.

There is also a port on the bottom of the MAP sensor mount on the EPP charge piping, that I believe is 1/8" NPT. That may be another option in the future as well.

Yes, this adapter installs between the MAP sensor and the IM where we swap out our 2-bar sensor. It appears to be a fairly complete kit.

Here are the install instructions, which also has a list of the included hardware. https://system.netsuite.com/core/media/media.nl?id=426153&c=830533&h=f333ecb0c63bad41fc6d&_xt=.pdf&ck=SOvAzYxHAmDnD1Ri&vid=RA6Nw4xHAmbnD0l2&cktime=149412&promocode=&promocodeaction=overwrite&addrcountry=AU&gc=clear&whence=

I'm currently using the charge pipe reference from Brad's how-to, but I'm thinking the lower boost reference from the IM might allow the boost regulator to not hang open quite so long after shifts and allow me to move back down to lower spring pressure settings without dialing back my boost.

SHOdded said:
Looking forward to results, MiWiAu.    Probably won't affect the MAP readings, but would like to have field data to bear that out.  Good point about the appearance cover.  Run nekked!!!

You know how I love my data, Manu. ;)

An A > B MAP comparison will be the very first thing I do.
 
MiWiAu said:
derfdog15 said:
I assume that is being used for the OE 2 bar that we switch to a 3 bar? Since it only has one bolt hole shown. Do they include hardware as well?

I am going to try to run my wastegate from the TIP, as AJP did originally, as my boost is acting slightly odd currently, and the TIP pressure reference should be a few kPA higher. I will report back whether that makes it run better, etc.

I picked up 2 T's (1/4" pipe thread), some 1/4" to 1/4" nipples, and appropriate clamps, as well as a few pipe thread plugs. I am going to plug the port on my cross to the wastegate mod. Then use a T on the TIP reference. If the car runs better/AJP likes it more that way, I will turn the cross into a T permanently.

There is also a port on the bottom of the MAP sensor mount on the EPP charge piping, that I believe is 1/8" NPT. That may be another option in the future as well.

Yes, this adapter installs between the MAP sensor and the IM where we swap out our 2-bar sensor. It appears to be a fairly complete kit.

Here are the install instructions, which also has a list of the included hardware. https://system.netsuite.com/core/media/media.nl?id=426153&c=830533&h=f333ecb0c63bad41fc6d&_xt=.pdf&ck=SOvAzYxHAmDnD1Ri&vid=RA6Nw4xHAmbnD0l2&cktime=149412&promocode=&promocodeaction=overwrite&addrcountry=AU&gc=clear&whence=

I'm currently using the charge pipe reference from Brad's how-to, but I'm thinking the lower boost reference from the IM might allow the boost regulator to not hang open quite so long after shifts and allow me to move back down to lower spring pressure settings without dialing back my boost.

SHOdded said:
Looking forward to results, MiWiAu.    Probably won't affect the MAP readings, but would like to have field data to bear that out.  Good point about the appearance cover.  Run nekked!!!

You know how I love my data, Manu. ;)

An A > B MAP comparison will be the very first thing I do.

That certainly does look complete. Upon further talking to Brad, I am going to try and use the reference port on the EPP charge pipe MAP sensor bung (essentially the same as your kit, except its already welded on my pipes, and only one port; and on the opposite MAP sensor). I will report back with my findings as well.
 
derfdog15 said:
I will report back with my findings as well.

Cool. By the end of this it looks like we'll have multiple ways to potentially dial in this boost regulator.

Look at this monstrosity you've created, Brad. I hope you're proud of yourself. LOL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Vacuum reference location update:

I was able to use the same vacuum hose piece that I used before, thought it is just barely too short (1/4") or less, so if this is going to be the permanent location I will cut a piece of the new hose I bought today. Otherwise I will save that. If this is not going to be the location then I will use the new hose to get access to the port for the TIP. Based on where the TIP reference is, it still may see a bit higher pressure than this one, since it is pre-intercooler, and this location is post intercooler on the MAP near the throttlebody. However, this is also the MAP sensor that is directly across from the wastegate.

I just sent logs to Brad to see what it looks like.

I will update with pics once my phone decides to work again


1st through 4th pic are of the routing to under the map sensor. You can see the port in the third picture, as well as clearance with hose installed and sensor installed in the 4th. the 5th picture is the TIP location that can also be used/may still be used. You can see the hose coming off of the charge pipe, with the chrome clamp holding it on. That is where the vacuum line may be routed to if this location does not suffice.

You can see in the pics that there is a bit of a sharp bend for the hose that I used, which is why I said it was a bit too short, however I did not want to cut up new hose for the sake of testing, if I was going to ultimately move to a different location (TIP reference).
 
StealBlueSho said:
Point is, don't bank on wastegate spring combinations by the spring chart alone, there is a reason for them developing the chart..

During Brad and my testing I needed around a 16.5 - 17 or so spring rate which is not available via the spring combinations.. verified when I called TiAL.. so that's when I threw on a manual boost controller..

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
I have a manual controller I am going to use also to dial it in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
f8tlSHO said:
StealBlueSho said:
Point is, don't bank on wastegate spring combinations by the spring chart alone, there is a reason for them developing the chart..

During Brad and my testing I needed around a 16.5 - 17 or so spring rate which is not available via the spring combinations.. verified when I called TiAL.. so that's when I threw on a manual boost controller..

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
I have a manual controller I am going to use also to dial it in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am starting to worry I may have to go that route. Had to step down to the 14.5 spring combo, though possibly that was just to make sure my gate works. Waiting on Brad to tell me the next step, but my gate definitely works on the 14.50 combo.
 
f8tlSHO said:
StealBlueSho said:
Point is, don't bank on wastegate spring combinations by the spring chart alone, there is a reason for them developing the chart..

During Brad and my testing I needed around a 16.5 - 17 or so spring rate which is not available via the spring combinations.. verified when I called TiAL.. so that's when I threw on a manual boost controller..

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
I have a manual controller I am going to use also to dial it in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Are you familiar enough with data logging and reading your own logs? There are several areas you need to monitor to tune for it.. map, tip, wgdc, rail pressure, and more.

And you need to monitor in real time...on a laptop...after each adjustment...or you can
mess stuff up...

If you are not confident in your ability to adjust the mbc based on what you are reading in the logs then don't do it. You are asking for trouble and most likely give Brad headaches...




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
derfdog15 said:
f8tlSHO said:
StealBlueSho said:
Point is, don't bank on wastegate spring combinations by the spring chart alone, there is a reason for them developing the chart..

During Brad and my testing I needed around a 16.5 - 17 or so spring rate which is not available via the spring combinations.. verified when I called TiAL.. so that's when I threw on a manual boost controller..

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
I have a manual controller I am going to use also to dial it in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am starting to worry I may have to go that route. Had to step down to the 14.5 spring combo, though possibly that was just to make sure my gate works. Waiting on Brad to tell me the next step, but my gate definitely works on the 14.50 combo.
Log? :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Honestly, listen to Brad, he will not steer you wrong. He is really good at what he does, let him let you know which spring is giving you the best results on the logs. I was looking for something very specific with the MBC setup... the tune he had me on before the mbc mod rocked all the other tunes I had.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
StealBlueSho said:
Honestly, listen to Brad, he will not steer you wrong. He is really good at what he does, let him let you know which spring is giving you the best results on the logs. I was looking for something very specific with the MBC setup... the tune he had me on before the mbc mod rocked all the other tunes I had.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They for sure have been awesome. I think for right now he is still needing to confirm my gate works. My car is pretty much doing the opposite of MiWiAu 's Xsport. Rather than having to spring way up and drop boost, I have not been cracking the gate on the first two spring combos(17.4 psi, 15.95) I may have cracked it a bit on the 15.95 not sure, but I didn't seem to hear it on those two. Definitely heard it on 14.50 so hopefully Brad knows what to do from here (I am sure he does)
 
StealBlueSho said:
Honestly, listen to Brad, he will not steer you wrong. He is really good at what he does, let him let you know which spring is giving you the best results on the logs. I was looking for something very specific with the MBC setup... the tune he had me on before the mbc mod rocked all the other tunes I had.

+1,000,000. Don't worry, little camper! Brad will get you sorted. :) Keep in mind, the industry standard for compression spring rate tolerance is +/-10%. Every single spring has the possibility of creating differences for each application, so there are bound to be nuances.

Considering all the other variables for each vehicle setup, it just requires some time to get it dialed in. One thing I can't stress enough about working with Brad is that he gives you a truly custom tune, which takes a little bit of time, but it will be right for YOUR car in the end.

The mention of StealBlueSho's MBC and my idea for a preload adjuster was not intended to freak anyone out or call into question Brad's ability to dial this thing in or the efficacy of the mod with the included kit springs. I was just looking to take things to another insane (and likely unnecessary) level. LOL

derfdog15 said:
They for sure have been awesome. I think for right now he is still needing to confirm my gate works. My car is pretty much doing the opposite of MiWiAu 's Xsport. Rather than having to spring way up and drop boost, I have not been cracking the gate on the first two spring combos(17.4 psi, 15.95) I may have cracked it a bit on the 15.95 not sure, but I didn't seem to hear it on those two. Definitely heard it on 14.50 so hopefully Brad knows what to do from here (I am sure he does)

When the gate opens, you'll know it (unless you're running in winter slush, like I did once). With my initial 15.95 combo, it was open from the 1>2 shift all the way through 3rd.

My advice would be to let Brad take the lead and let him direct your changes. Part of my issue was I got a wild hair and went and ran a ton of spring combos and inundated him with data logs (surprised, right? LOL). Then I left for a week on a business trip and when I got back, I had us off on such a tangent that we never circled back to one of the combos that may ultimately work better than the one I have now. Brad went back through some of my older boost regulator logs and found one that actually looked pretty good with a lower spring combo (17.4), so we're going to circle back on it once I get my new boost reference adapter.

To recap, don't get worried. Take your time; it's a [fun] process! Brad rulez!
 
Here are my most recent logs. Rev18&19 Logs are on the 17.40 PSI combo. Rev20 and Rev20_MAPVacuumSource are on 15.95PSI. The latter of the two is with the boost reference on the charge pipe location, the 3 bar sensor right by the throttlebody (TIP sensor I believe?) that is shown in the pictures above. Rev20_ChargePipe3BarVacuum_14_50PSI is on the 14.50 PSI combo, as the name denotes. I am still not the best at looking at logs, but am trying to learn. Any comments anyone wants to make, feel free.
 
derf, quick question on your Tial setup. You have your boost reference running to the bottom side of the diaphragm, with the extra air ports plugged (with thread lock or sealer), correct? And on the spring side of the diaphragm, you have at least one of the cap ports vented to atmosphere?
 
MiWiAu said:
derf, quick question on your Tial setup. You have your boost reference running to the bottom side of the diaphragm, with the extra air ports plugged (with thread lock or sealer), correct? And on the spring side of the diaphragm, you have at least one of the cap ports vented to atmosphere?

I have one air port on the bottom as my reference. The other two are capped (no sealent/thread lock - I talked to support for the company I bought it from, and they said with the manner of bolt, etc. none was needed, could this be an issue with how it is currently?).

Both top ports are open currently, as that is how the instructions stated to do it for a VTA wastegate.
 
Back
Top